-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> BTW, Is the O.P. still here? I wonder if he is re-thinking his
> requirements.
The requirement is to do one-way delay measurements. The requirement isn't
changing. I'm just here to educate myself as to how to do the best job we can.
> (1) Your method: [one-way delay]
> (2) Easy method: [traceroute[
> I suggest using method #2 for your network timing. Method #1 is
> simply to expensive and technically hard
That's why there are some of us who spend money and work on hard problems.
Traceroute already exists. In fact, plenty of one-way delay measurements
already exist. We're just doing a larger, better one. Yes, that takes time
and money. "Math is hard, let's go shopping" isn't a particularly interesting
argument.
-Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org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=v+Vt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
