Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-15 Thread Steve Rooke
measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 11:25:44 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data John glad you are getting good results and have something to compare to. Back to me who doesn't have any knowns but lots of guessing. Attached is a run with a box cover over the pictic

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-15 Thread Brian Kirby
In Plotter, use the SERIES menu/dropdown to scale the data. As an example for DMTD, I have to multiply the data times 1e-6: Gave the new data a name, in the top of the dropdown, then in this case, enter this formula, in the bottom of the dropdown; X1*1e-6 where X1 is the data WHen it gets

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-15 Thread Bob Camp
as opposed to 1-pps. -- john, KE5FX - Original Message From: John Miles jmi...@pop.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 10:19:46 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data A few preliminary measurements here (I'm

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-15 Thread Stanley Reynolds
- Original Message From: Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sun, August 15, 2010 7:05:40 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data On 15 August 2010 17:01, Stanley Reynolds stanley_reyno...@yahoo.com wrote

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-15 Thread Steve Rooke
On 16 August 2010 01:51, Stanley Reynolds stanley_reyno...@yahoo.com wrote: - Original Message From: Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sun, August 15, 2010 7:05:40 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-15 Thread Don Latham
Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 9:38:37 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data No, the board is not in a case. An annotated graph attached. I think the 100 sec oscillations are a vane that moves up and down on the a/c unit as this is washed out on the two door opens. - Original Message

[time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread Stanley Reynolds
Attached is my first pictic ii data. It is the difference between the PPS output of a Trak 8820 and a Odetics Comsync. Turned on the counter display at the end of the run to show that most of the data was the interpolars.   Stanley 001073 001075 001072 001072 001066

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread Stanley Reynolds
My guess as to what the data may indicate is performance of the 10 Mhz 20PPM PICTIC internal oscillator, need to repeat test with precision 10Mhz and auto calibrate off. Fatness of the line/width maybe PICTIC error. Note graph seems to show me leaving the room and returning via the outside

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Is it shielded from drafts? Bob On Aug 14, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Stanley Reynolds stanley_reyno...@yahoo.com wrote: My guess as to what the data may indicate is performance of the 10 Mhz 20PPM PICTIC internal oscillator, need to repeat test with precision 10Mhz and auto calibrate

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread Stanley Reynolds
stanley_reyno...@yahoo.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 9:38:37 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data No, the board is not in a case. An annotated graph attached. I think the 100 sec oscillations are a vane that moves up and down

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread John Miles
, 2010 7:12 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data My guess as to what the data may indicate is performance of the 10 Mhz 20PPM PICTIC internal oscillator, need to repeat test with precision 10Mhz and auto calibrate off. Fatness

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread John Miles
are working directly with RF signals as opposed to 1-pps. -- john, KE5FX - Original Message From: John Miles jmi...@pop.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 10:19:46 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread John Miles
-nuts] PicTic Data Attached is my first pictic ii data. It is the difference between the PPS output of a Trak 8820 and a Odetics Comsync. Turned on the counter display at the end of the run to show that most of the data was the interpolars.   Stanley attachment

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread Stanley Reynolds
and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 11:25:44 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data John glad you are getting good results and have something to compare to. Back to me who doesn't have any knowns but lots of guessing. Attached is a run with a box cover over

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread Stanley Reynolds
14, 2010 11:46:49 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data Here's your first run in red, compared to your second one in green... -- john, KE5FX -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on Behalf Of Stanley Reynolds Sent: Saturday, August

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread John Miles
Thanks for looking at my data that was what I was fishing for all along :-) You can import it the same way, actually -- install the TimeLab beta at www.ke5fx.com/timelab/setup.exe and use File-Import ASCII Phase Data to read your file. Set Nominal Frequency to 1, Numeric Field # to whichever

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread Bruce Griffiths
: Sat, August 14, 2010 11:25:44 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data John glad you are getting good results and have something to compare to. Back to me who doesn't have any knowns but lots of guessing. Attached is a run with a box cover over the pictic, run is shorter ~ 800 seconds

Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data

2010-08-14 Thread Bruce Griffiths
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sat, August 14, 2010 11:25:44 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PicTic Data John glad you are getting good results and have something to compare to. Back to me who doesn't have any knowns but lots of guessing. Attached