Re: [time-nuts] Transformer inrush current and transformer simulation

2016-06-08 Thread Gerhard Hoffmann
Am 08.06.2016 um 02:31 schrieb Mike Monett: I was not interested in examining the frequency response, saturation effect or core losses. These are only important after the core goes into saturation. I was only interested in the result of switching at the peak or at the zero crossing. This is

Re: [time-nuts] Transformer inrush current and transformer simulation

2016-06-07 Thread Mike Monett
> OnFri,03 Jun 2016 12:37:26 -0400"Mike Monett" > wrote: >> I found a significant error in the LTspice analysis. I was >> wondering how the current could jump instantaneously at zero when >> the voltage is applied at the peak. That

Re: [time-nuts] Transformer inrush current and transformer simulation

2016-06-04 Thread Chris Albertson
Don't let the start of the simulation be the power on time. Best to set up the AC mains volts at zero volts for a half second then go up to 120 VAC. So you actually simulate the power switch. The time before the start of the run is not defined Also you should Google "spice transformer model"

[time-nuts] Transformer inrush current and transformer simulation

2016-06-03 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:37:26 -0400 "Mike Monett" wrote: > I found a significant error in the LTspice analysis. I was wondering how > the current could jump instantaneously at zero when the voltage is applied > at the peak. That violates magnetism. > > It turns out