Oooh, very nice, the full monty of tuning goodness!After doing all that
you can spend countless hours tweaking things in search of maximum
time-nut-goodness...
I'm not sure that a 96 hour precision survey is measurably better than 48
hours, but what the heck, might as well go for it.
David,
Don't tap the time LEDs.
For InCase series NEO-M8T TIME & RAW receiver board
(https://www.csgshop.com/product.php?id_product=218), access to PPS is
through the 12 pin JST SH socket, its harness or the breakout board it
feeds.
You can see the breakout board's labelled items at
Martin Burnicki wrote:
> Agreed, but that's simply wrong. If you ran a PTP daemon instead of an
> NTP daemon you had exactly the same problems when the PTP daemon passes
> a leap second announcement to the kernel.
PTP never does that. IEEE-1588 has a different epoch but is based on
TAI, which
On Sat 2019-01-19T12:15:28-0800 Steve Allen hath writ:
> The most expedient place to find them are roughly pages B7 to B12 in a
> current Astronomical Almanac. See for example
> https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.31822038913307;view=1up;seq=116
Emphasizing one point, it has always been
Replying to my own email as I understand my mistake...
Of course the leap seconds must be applied. The whole point of the leap
seconds is for UTC to be consistent with the actual position of the earth
in the sky, so to get accurate mjd, I have to use UTC.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:33 AM Didier
Hi
This has swung over to the “is it legit” / supported question. What’s below is
*only* in reference to that part:
There are various levels of “legit” when it comes to these modules. Some are
100% uBlox produced
units with flash code. Some are equally 100% uBlox, but have the firmware in
Hi Chris,
By query I meant poll settings, sorry.
Your screenshot shows 1MHz configured on TIMEPULSE 2. I don't think it is
going to work.
Standard products used to have 1kHz frequency limit on TIMEPULSE 2. I have not
checked any FTS functionality recently.
The manual (Receiver Description)
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:00 PM Steve Allen wrote:
>
> This expression is no longer in use. It was superseded Capitaine et al.
>
> http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2003A%26A...406.1135C
> in which formalism it is explicitly disavowed that earth rotation is time.
>
>
Hi Steve,
Thanks a lot for the references and background information. Looks like I
have more reading to do... I was not planning to for this project but it is
interesting.
I have seen references to using half days in some code samples. I suppose
this is what Brooke referred to when he said
When I was playing with the sidereal time code I found lots of buggy/bogus
implementations and also lots of web calculators that were either totally wrong
or off by some amount.Same for sunrise/sunset code and equation-of-time
code. It's hard to know what code / sites you can trust.
10 matches
Mail list logo