Am 12.02.19 um 03:57 schrieb Jeff Blaine:
I have these 3 systems operational here and wonder what is the "best"
of the sources?
The local use for the reference is as a time base for test equipment.
Nothing hyper critical in the way of end-use requirements - but after
running the NT GPSDO
I have these 3 systems operational here and wonder what is the "best" of
the sources?
The local use for the reference is as a time base for test equipment.
Nothing hyper critical in the way of end-use requirements - but after
running the NT GPSDO for a few years and watching the Lucent box
Hi
Now for a bit more of the storyt :)
If you take your 24 hours worth of data from the F9P and send it to NRCan for
analysis,
they come back with a plot and data file that shows the clock running about +/-
2 ns over
the 24 hour period. The ADEV at one second is about 10X better than what
Anyone seen a uBlox F9T dev board yet similar to the SparkFun unit?
I was going to pull the trigger on SparkFun unit but decided to save my
clams until someone came out with an F9T...
thanks,
ben
___
time-nuts mailing list --
I got in a Ublox F9P multi-band receiver from Sparkfun. Lately I've been
testing the 1PPS output. This data is from the F9P tracking GPS and GLONASS
L1 and L2. The PPS was measured by a TAPR TICC clocked by an HP-5071A. BTW,
processing the raw F9P measurement data with CSRS-PPP produces
Sorry, perhaps off-topic but relevant given the pursuit of mineral
mining globally. In 1968, the U.S. Bureau of Mines had a very accurate
model (pre-econometric, if there is such a thing) of Mica production in
India down to the State level (primarily Bihar - the poorest state in
India). As a
