>> https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2019/06/2019-nist-time-and-frequency-seminar
>
> Mother of God, John, what makes this meeting worth the price?
Hi Bill,
Yes, it sounds high but perhaps not out of line for multi-day professional
conferences / seminars these days. True, you have to
On 2/15/19 3:33 PM, John C. Westmoreland, P.E. wrote:
Jim,
...
Please register by June 4, 2019 to ensure your spot at this event. The
registration fee is $1,900.
Thanks for the heads up.
Best Regards,
John W.
It *is* a bit pricey - - I didn't see if there's a time-nuts promo
code.
IEEE
Mother of God, John, what makes this meeting worth the price?
On Friday, February 15, 2019, John C. Westmoreland, P.E. <
j...@westmorelandengineering.com> wrote:
> Jim,
> ...
> Please register by June 4, 2019 to ensure your spot at this event. The
> registration fee is $1,900.
>
> Thanks for
Jim,
...
Please register by June 4, 2019 to ensure your spot at this event. The
registration fee is $1,900.
Thanks for the heads up.
Best Regards,
John W.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 3:00 PM jimlux wrote:
>
> https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2019/06/2019-nist-time-and-frequency-seminar
>
Why "virtually" and not exactly identical? Maybe the answer is in the details...
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:01 AM Mark Sims wrote:
>
> I am adding the ability to Lady Heather to apply receiver sawtooth correction
> values to measured PPS values... this requires having a receiver that outputs
>
Hi
Well … since you asked …. ummm… F9P:
Run a second type of receiver ( Furuno GT-87 maybe)
Measure it
Sawtooth correct it
Compare corrected receiver A to corrected receiver B
Sure am glad that I’m too far away to be hit by that rock that just got tossed
my way :)
Bob
> On Feb 15, 2019, at
In message , Mark Sims writes:
>For all the receivers that I have tested there is only one combination
>that jumps out as being the correct one. However, for the new
>Ublox F9P, there are two combinations that produce virtually identical
>measurements and statistics (add current
I am adding the ability to Lady Heather to apply receiver sawtooth correction
values to measured PPS values... this requires having a receiver that outputs
sawtooth values as the main input device and connecting a TICC/counter
measuring the receiver PPS output as an auxiliary input device.
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2019/06/2019-nist-time-and-frequency-seminar
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the
Hi all,
Since I have seen people asking for something like this before:
I made an interface for connecting a more commonly available display
to a 53131A, useful if the VFD (display) is worn out.
It is AVR/Arduino based to keep it simple to build and cheap, and it
is supposed to be easy to add
Hello,
sorry to reopen this old thread but it took me some time to measure. As
I've said I have one RTC module sitting right on my desk in my room
where temperatures can go anywhere between 3C and 20C.
Using naive method of comparison of time difference between system time
and RTC module I get
Hi
Indeed this is exactly what is done with a pipe thread. It’s not designed to be
fiddled
with a lot. You put it together and that’s it forever and ever. Some bright
engineer
might have decided that antenna mounts fit in the same category.
My bet still would be on a tool or die that was a
12 matches
Mail list logo
