As far as I'm aware, the Thunderbolt E models are the only one ones
with firmware new enough to handle the WNRO. Even the single-oven
OXCO version of the E is EOL, but it at least is new enough.
I'm also pretty sure the Es have BNC connectors, at least both of mine do.
-Dustin
On Fri, Nov 15,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:08 PM djl wrote:
>
>
> Any quick opinions re use of chrony vs other NTP implementations?
> THANKS
> Don
It really depends on the use case. chrony seems to pick a "best"
source and try really really hard to track that one true source. ntpd
tries to intelligently track
I’m sure it’s probably receiver specific. I know the M8 series of UBlox
specifically say to disable SBAS for timing purposes. Not sure about the
Novatel.
-Dustin
On Apr 14, 2019, 9:00 PM -0500, Skip Withrow , wrote:
> I'm wondering if GPS augmentation services improve a receiver's 1pps
>
three P9Ts so that you can use
> > differential mode for best timing accuracy. I see no on board quantization
> > error correction mentioned, nor quantization error reporting though I
> > expect that is there, so for best accurracy that has to be added. This
> > loo
This looks ideal to me:
https://www.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/RCB-F9T_ProductSummary_%28UBX-18069985%29.pdf
-Dustin
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 8:01 PM Angus via time-nuts
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It doesn't look like the F9P does anything special for timing - the
> timing specs given in the F9T
If DigiKey's pricing is accurate, the ZED-F9T is $13.89 more than a
ZED-F9P. I would have gladly paid $14 more for a version of the
SparkFun board using the T(iming) version instead :(.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:10 AM Bob kb8tq wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> From a *very* quick read of the doc’s:
>
> 1)
