On 10.01.22 16:23, Lux, Jim wrote:
And I suppose this is why it's worth talking to the mfr than looking
through the catalogs. There might well be some key requirement that if
relaxed slightly would work out quite well in terms of availability.
We run into this all the time in the space
Hi,
On 2022-01-10 15:41, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:35:17 +0100
Attila Kinali wrote:
That said, are yo sure you need such stringend phase noise requirements?
It's audio. Nobody is going to hear whether the noise is -60dBc or -80dBc @ 1Hz,
much less -120dBc.
To give here a
On 1/10/22 7:12 AM, Bernd Neubig wrote:
We are receiving such inquiries from "Audio nuts" rather frequently, but
also from professional high-end audios-studio equipment makers. There
argument is often, that the spatial transparency of the sound, i.e. how
exactly you can locate the sound source
Just curious: Do you, from your customer interactions, have the
impression that your customers are equipped to verify those performance
figures? Or do they essentially have to trust you?
Cheers
Stefan
Am 10.01.2022 um 16:12 schrieb Bernd Neubig:
We are receiving such inquiries from "Audio
We are receiving such inquiries from "Audio nuts" rather frequently, but
also from professional high-end audios-studio equipment makers. There
argument is often, that the spatial transparency of the sound, i.e. how
exactly you can locate the sound source (instrument in an orchestra) would
be