Re: [time-nuts] NIST

2018-08-11 Thread Dana Whitlow
I fear the worst. The line in the website simply stated something like "shutting down the transmitters in Colorado and Hawaii", which would seem to include the whole enchilada. For the wall clocks, GPS should work well if people are willing to go to battery- backed AC power. But not so good for

Re: [time-nuts] NIST

2018-08-11 Thread Bob Albert via time-nuts
With any luck, the current administration will successfully push the USA down technically.  Denying global warming, shutting off time signals, and so on, is great stuff. On Saturday, August 11, 2018, 6:10:12 PM PDT, Bob kb8tq wrote: Hi One would *guess* that stopping WWVB (and

Re: [time-nuts] NIST

2018-08-11 Thread Tom Van Baak
> I wonder if anybody will market a GPS-to-WWVB translator? > Dana You can find lots of these projects on the web: in the time-nuts archives, eevblog, hackaday, or sometimes completed multi-band kits (WWVB / DCF77 / JJY) on eBay. Search for a couple of words like signal wwvb simulator

Re: [time-nuts] NIST

2018-08-11 Thread Jwahar Bammi via time-nuts
Andy Backus, Would love to see your microwatt transmitter design, per chance have you posted it anywhere. cheers, bammi ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] NIST

2018-08-11 Thread paul swed
This one almost slipped by me. I see NIST seems to have taken down the link or details. So they want to shut down the services. I suppose that makes some sense. But would like to see what that means. LF and HF... Regards Paul WB8TSL On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Steven Sommars wrote: > I

[time-nuts] Stable32 Input (Multiplier)

2018-08-11 Thread Mark Sims
Also note that Heather can only get/update the FC value (usually( every two seconds. Occasionally, due to vagaries in the PRS-10 response timing, you can see two consecutive values in the log that are not the same. > 2) Have any of you ever logged the FC values while at the same time taken

Re: [time-nuts] Stable32 Input (Multiplier)

2018-08-11 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi, On 08/11/2018 05:32 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote: >> Should the multiplier value be +1.0e-09 or +1.0e-10? > > I worked with Chris off-list on this one. It turns out he was measuring his > new PRS10 and trying to match his ADEV plots against the published plots from > SRS.

Re: [time-nuts] Stable32 Input (Multiplier)

2018-08-11 Thread Tom Van Baak
> Should the multiplier value be +1.0e-09 or +1.0e-10? I worked with Chris off-list on this one. It turns out he was measuring his new PRS10 and trying to match his ADEV plots against the published plots from SRS. Hence the request about 1e-9 (which is ppb and should be

Re: [time-nuts] NIST

2018-08-11 Thread Steven Sommars
I found the public comments from Microsemi , but couldn't locate my response. At one time the full set of RFI public responses was on-line. The NIST 60 kHz time service is widely used by