Hi
Go indoors in the basement inside an inner room. You can at some times of day
get WWVB.
With a normal building, GPS isn’t going to make it. Even if it does, the
signals will be degraded
enough that you will have a tough time using in.
Bob
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 8:47 PM, Wayne Holder
> If you are fairly deep inside a building, GPS isn’t going to get there.
WWVB likely
> will make it to an internal location.
Interesting thought. I wonder if anyone has tested WWVB reception in a
deep underground location such as a sub sub level in a building or parking
garage?
Wayne
On Mon,
Hi
If you are fairly deep inside a building, GPS isn’t going to get there. WWVB
likely
will make it to an internal location.
If you are convinced that WWVB is un-jamable and that GPS is easily jammed, WWVB
would be more robust.
That’s about it.
Bob
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 7:56 PM, Wayne
While reading this thread and pondering whether to buy and fool around with
an ES100-based module from Universal Solder, I suddenly found myself
wondering if there was any advantage to using the time received from WWVB
vs just using an inexpensive GPS receiver. The ES100 module costs about
$70,
Good detective work. Oren is who I used to talk with at everset.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 4:32 PM Joseph Gwinn wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:00:02 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com
> wrote:
>
> > time-nuts Digest, Vol 173, Issue 44
>
> > Message: 7
> > Date: Mon, 31
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:00:02 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com
wrote:
> time-nuts Digest, Vol 173, Issue 44
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 04:04:22 -0800
> From: "Tom Van Baak"
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
>
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] More
This is good work and I have been following.
What caught my attention was the 2 X very fast codes. I remember talking to
the everset folks early on and the high speed code could be turned on. It
had not been. The ES100 will not track that code as mentioned. Did not
think they actually ever turned
The "Two High Gain Antennas" feature is laughable :-)
On 12/31/2018 8:57 AM, Patrick Murphy wrote:
Just a heads-up. Universal Solder has two different ES100 devices back in
stock.
https://universal-solder.ca/product/everset-es100-cob-wwvb-60khz-bpsk-receiver-kit-with-2-antennas/
Time-standard based stories are probably on-topic, but for those wanting a
wider range of subjects without posting to the list,
http://hpmemoryproject.org/ has good stuff. And, of course, the
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/journal.html
Tek produced a book :
Just a heads-up. Universal Solder has two different ES100 devices back in
stock.
https://universal-solder.ca/product/everset-es100-cob-wwvb-60khz-bpsk-receiver-kit-with-2-antennas/
https://universal-solder.ca/product/everset-es100-adk-v2-wwvb-bpsk-phase-modulation-receiver/
-Pat (KG5YPQ)
hello to the group.
I really am enjoying the stories and in reality history about a great
company that I am very proud to actually own a lot of its technology.
Though purchased for $/lbs at hamfests and such. All needing TLC and all of
it teaching me more then a few lessons on how to do things.
So
In message , Magnus D
anielson writes:
>> measure (start=house_std, stop=siggen) and (start=siggen, stop=house_std) for
>> as many siggen phase settings as you have patience for.
>
>Well, this was the second setup I was talking about. To disclose the
>full non-linearity you want to tweak
Hi Graham,
That's very nice work. And you have uncovered several unusual effects in the
ES100. Bugs? Features? If we time nuts keep up the good work to evaluate this
chip, we are likely at some point to get an informative response from the guys
who designed it. They read time-nuts.
So now
Hi,
On 12/31/18 7:31 AM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>> This email chain has unleashed a flood of memories from 30 years ago.
>> Hopefully a few of you find this walk down memory lane interesting.
>> I have a few more stories in the que if any of you are still interested.
>>
>> Hugh Rice
>
> Somewhere
> Thanks Tom for your quick and extensive reply.
> Indeed I confused Time Interval with Phase Difference…
...
> By the way, it also seems that HDEV at Tau=1 is 2/sqrt(3) * Sigma = 1.15
> SigmaTIC
>
I don't believe that HDEV result. For many large runs of simulated normalized
white phase
15 matches
Mail list logo