d, 13 Nov 2019 10:05:32 -0500
> > From: paul swed
> > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> >
> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 184, Issue 13
> > Message-ID:
> >f2mgtzb...@mail.gmail.com>
> > Conten
19 10:05:32 -0500
> > From: paul swed
> > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> >
> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 184, Issue 13
> > Message-ID:
> >f2mgtzb...@mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; chars
0500
From: paul swed
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 184, Issue 13
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi Dan at least the pictures I have seen are that the ionizer is a thin
ribb
Hi Dan at least the pictures I have seen are that the ionizer is a thin
ribbon. I have not seen a filament style ionizer for cesium beam tubes.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:16 PM Dan Kemppainen
wrote:
> So,
>
> If I'm interpreting the pictures correctly, It appears the hot
Hi
For less than the price of a brand new tube, you can take it over and get it
run
through a 3D X-Ray setup. Not cheap, but then you will *know* what’s what
in this specific tube. Last time I got into doing that sort of thing it was way
more
expensive than what I would spend in this case.
So,
If I'm interpreting the pictures correctly, It appears the hot wire
ionizer wire is spring loaded. It would probably take a significant
impact to spring that back enough for the wire to weld back with any
sort of discharge.
It may be possible, but most likely not very easy to do.