Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...

2014-01-20 Thread Jim Lux

On 1/20/14 10:06 AM, Jim Lux wrote:

On 1/19/14 1:51 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
  Use 24h clocks for

best results. They can be had from www.clockkit.com, an excellent
source of DIY quartz clock parts.




I couldn't find 24hr movements on the clockkit.com site.. where are they?



http://www.klockit.com/depts/SpecialtyClockMovements/dept-379.html



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...

2014-01-20 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

So really it boils down to :

http://www.klockit.com/products/dept-379__sku-bbbii.html

Since that already has a full driver on it (battery / oscillator / chip) - you 
will need to do some surgery to get directly at the stepper motor. (or am I 
missing something?)

Bob


On Jan 20, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net wrote:

 On 1/20/14 10:06 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
 On 1/19/14 1:51 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
  Use 24h clocks for
 best results. They can be had from www.clockkit.com, an excellent
 source of DIY quartz clock parts.
 
 
 
 I couldn't find 24hr movements on the clockkit.com site.. where are they?
 
 
 http://www.klockit.com/depts/SpecialtyClockMovements/dept-379.html
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...

2014-01-20 Thread Rex
That listing is a bit vague about if it has a second hand. For the kind 
of pulse drive that has been discussed here, it seems you would want a 
definite second capability and step vs. smooth second hand drive.


I know nothing except a little web searching, but this one seems to have 
the right features...

http://www.clockparts.com/clock-part/24-hour-high-torque-movement/

but, although they mention a 24-hour dial available, the page for it on 
the site has no content.


Searching eBay gave some hits, but most of what I saw for 24-hour 
movements seemed to have smooth second hand (not step).



On 1/20/2014 10:17 AM, Jim Lux wrote:

On 1/20/14 10:06 AM, Jim Lux wrote:

On 1/19/14 1:51 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
  Use 24h clocks for

best results. They can be had from www.clockkit.com, an excellent
source of DIY quartz clock parts.




I couldn't find 24hr movements on the clockkit.com site.. where are 
they?




http://www.klockit.com/depts/SpecialtyClockMovements/dept-379.html



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...

2014-01-20 Thread Jim Lux

On 1/20/14 3:32 PM, Rex wrote:

That listing is a bit vague about if it has a second hand. For the kind
of pulse drive that has been discussed here, it seems you would want a
definite second capability and step vs. smooth second hand drive.

I know nothing except a little web searching, but this one seems to have
the right features...
http://www.clockparts.com/clock-part/24-hour-high-torque-movement/

but, although they mention a 24-hour dial available, the page for it on
the site has no content.



it is very much a matter of buying a few and trying them.

If you don't install a second hand, then that solves the inertia of the 
secondhand problem.


The challenge is that because the motor for these things is basically 
a step at a time, if the hand has too much inertia, then the hand will 
either not move enough to get to the next tep (dying battery syndrome 
we've all seen), or, it will move past (because the braking torque 
isn't high enough.


It's sort of the torsional resonance effect that afflicts stepper motors 
in another form.  The magnetic impulse is basically driving a spring 
(the magnetic field) with a mass on it.


These things are always highly idiosyncratic. I would imagine that 
fiddling with the duration and magnitude of the step pulses (or, for 
that matter the shape of the pulse) could have a huge effect if one 
wanted to optimize it. A couple decades ago we built a large (5-6 foot 
diameter) stopwatch prop with a stepper motor, and we had to play with 
the drive voltage, the capacitance and resistance in the step channels 
to make it work right.  Today, you'd do microstepping, or use a clever 
algorithm to customize the step waveform.  Generally you want a voltage 
profile that's sort of a spike (to get the current flowing in the 
winding) with a back porch, and then a reverse polarity at the end (to 
stop the motion).


(I note that this problem is not unique to AA powered clocks.  The hands 
of the clock on the UC Berkeley Campanile are wood for a similar reason.)


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...

2014-01-20 Thread Robert LaJeunesse
Since most of those cheapo movements are a simple single-coil motor, energized 
with alternating polarity short pulses, it would seem that there is no need for 
a 24 hour movement. You can just have your micro pulse it twice the normal 
period, but with the same as normal pulse width(s). Check out the movement 
teardown in lunchtime clock at Instructables.com - 
http://www.instructables.com/id/Lunchtime-Clock/

Bob LaJeunesse




 From: Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net
To: time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...
 

On 1/20/14 3:32 PM, Rex wrote:
 That listing is a bit vague about if it has a second hand. For the kind
 of pulse drive that has been discussed here, it seems you would want a
 definite second capability and step vs. smooth second hand drive.
 
 I know nothing except a little web searching, but this one seems to have
 the right features...
 http://www.clockparts.com/clock-part/24-hour-high-torque-movement/
 
 but, although they mention a 24-hour dial available, the page for it on
 the site has no content.
 

it is very much a matter of buying a few and trying them.

If you don't install a second hand, then that solves the inertia of the 
secondhand problem.

The challenge is that because the motor for these things is basically a step 
at a time, if the hand has too much inertia, then the hand will either not 
move enough to get to the next tep (dying battery syndrome we've all seen), 
or, it will move past (because the braking torque isn't high enough.

It's sort of the torsional resonance effect that afflicts stepper motors in 
another form.  The magnetic impulse is basically driving a spring (the 
magnetic field) with a mass on it.

These things are always highly idiosyncratic. I would imagine that fiddling 
with the duration and magnitude of the step pulses (or, for that matter the 
shape of the pulse) could have a huge effect if one wanted to optimize it. A 
couple decades ago we built a large (5-6 foot diameter) stopwatch prop with a 
stepper motor, and we had to play with the drive voltage, the capacitance and 
resistance in the step channels to make it work right.  Today, you'd do 
microstepping, or use a clever algorithm to customize the step waveform.  
Generally you want a voltage profile that's sort of a spike (to get the 
current flowing in the winding) with a back porch, and then a reverse polarity 
at the end (to stop the motion).

(I note that this problem is not unique to AA powered clocks.  The hands of 
the clock on the UC Berkeley Campanile are wood for a similar reason.)

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...

2014-01-20 Thread Rex
I think there is a slight flaw in slowing the drive to half rate. The 
hour hand could then go around once in 24 hours, but the minute and 
second hand movement is halved too. Rather non-intuitive to read unless 
you only put on the hour hand and make a new 24-hour dial face.


On 1/20/2014 5:57 PM, Robert LaJeunesse wrote:

Since most of those cheapo movements are a simple single-coil motor, energized with alternating 
polarity short pulses, it would seem that there is no need for a 24 hour movement. You 
can just have your micro pulse it twice the normal period, but with the same as normal pulse 
width(s). Check out the movement teardown in lunchtime clock at Instructables.com - 
http://www.instructables.com/id/Lunchtime-Clock/

Bob LaJeunesse





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...

2014-01-20 Thread Rex

Jim, I think you missed the main point I was trying to address.

It seems that many of the newer quartz movements do not move the second 
hand in one-second steps. They move it in some way that appears smooth 
to a human observer. (Even if there is no actual second hand, the same 
motive issues need to be looked at.) I assume the smooth motor is still 
some kind of stepper but being driven by pulses at a much higher rate 
than a one-second rate. If you receive one of these versions, you will 
have a more difficult job to drive it. You'd need to figure out what 
rate is driving it and generate that. The 1-second step versions would 
be easier for us to generically interface with.


The description on the Klockit page wasn't very clear about which type 
it is (also it was somewhat ambiguous about using a secondhand, at all, 
if desired -- there is a footnote that I couldn't quite decipher).



On 1/20/2014 4:04 PM, Jim Lux wrote:

On 1/20/14 3:32 PM, Rex wrote:

That listing is a bit vague about if it has a second hand. For the kind
of pulse drive that has been discussed here, it seems you would want a
definite second capability and step vs. smooth second hand drive.

I know nothing except a little web searching, but this one seems to have
the right features...
http://www.clockparts.com/clock-part/24-hour-high-torque-movement/

but, although they mention a 24-hour dial available, the page for it on
the site has no content.



it is very much a matter of buying a few and trying them.

If you don't install a second hand, then that solves the inertia of 
the secondhand problem.


The challenge is that because the motor for these things is 
basically a step at a time, if the hand has too much inertia, then the 
hand will either not move enough to get to the next tep (dying battery 
syndrome we've all seen), or, it will move past (because the braking 
torque isn't high enough.


It's sort of the torsional resonance effect that afflicts stepper 
motors in another form.  The magnetic impulse is basically driving a 
spring (the magnetic field) with a mass on it.


These things are always highly idiosyncratic. I would imagine that 
fiddling with the duration and magnitude of the step pulses (or, for 
that matter the shape of the pulse) could have a huge effect if one 
wanted to optimize it. A couple decades ago we built a large (5-6 foot 
diameter) stopwatch prop with a stepper motor, and we had to play with 
the drive voltage, the capacitance and resistance in the step channels 
to make it work right.  Today, you'd do microstepping, or use a clever 
algorithm to customize the step waveform.  Generally you want a 
voltage profile that's sort of a spike (to get the current flowing in 
the winding) with a back porch, and then a reverse polarity at the end 
(to stop the motion).


(I note that this problem is not unique to AA powered clocks.  The 
hands of the clock on the UC Berkeley Campanile are wood for a similar 
reason.)


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 24 hr clock movements...

2014-01-20 Thread Jim Lux

On 1/20/14 5:57 PM, Robert LaJeunesse wrote:

Since most of those cheapo movements are a simple single-coil motor, energized with alternating 
polarity short pulses, it would seem that there is no need for a 24 hour movement. You 
can just have your micro pulse it twice the normal period, but with the same as normal pulse 
width(s). Check out the movement teardown in lunchtime clock at Instructables.com - 
http://www.instructables.com/id/Lunchtime-Clock/





The difference is that a 24 hr clock has a 24:1 gear ratio between 
minute and hour hands, and a 12 hr clock has 12:1.


If you're doing hour hand only, yep, any movement will do.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.