On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:56:20 +
Mark Sims wrote:
> RDR Electronics has SA22's for not much more than the X72.
> The problem with SA22's is the connector. It is a dual row 18 pin
> connector with 2mm pitch.
At least you can get 2mm header pins quite easily. But yes, I
FYI, a small number of interface boards for the SA22 are available
here: www.ebay.com/itm/142461937901 . If you look in the Designer's
Reference & User's Guide, it shows the adapter board with and without
the heat sink. It has the same connector as the X72, but you don't have
to use it!
Hi
A lot of the OEM’s seem to be going with a large multi layer PCB as the
“heatsink” for
the lightweight Rb’s. Apparently they have enough airflow through their racks
that this
works ok for them. In that case, I think I’d prefer some sort of “cheap” SMD
PC mount
connector. Faster to
Hello Ed,
No I do not want to use a printer cable to connect to the X72
oscillator. This is not recommendable as you wrote for several reasons.
I would prefer a solution which uses an actual connector which could
replace the obsolete Molex 52660-2651 plug.
This is very difficult because every
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:22:18 +
Mark Sims wrote:
> It can also be used with the SA22.c once a board that breaks out the SA22
> connector pinouts to a 34 pin cable (8 pins are for the SA22.c +5V power/
> gnd) is built. Note the TO-220 LM7805 voltage regulator...
Chris,
Are you suggesting reusing the entire cable? I wasn't suggesting that.
The cable is over a meter long! Even if the wiring was correct, which
it isn't, I don't know if you could pull enough power through those 28
guage wires even though they have multiple leads in parallel. Either
Hello all,
here is the connection schematics from symmetricoms designer manual for
the X72.
So you see, that there is no need for an25 pin connector on the boards
side :)
If someone wants to download the X72 designer guide here it is:
I did some more work on the HP printer cable that uses this connector.
Here's what I found:
1. Pin 25 on the X72 connector is unconnected.
2. The connector is IDC. It's possible to open it up and add the extra
lead, but like all IDC connectors, it's rather fragile.
3. Of the 25 leads in
Hi
10 MHz sine output would be pretty high up on my list of “pins to send
someplace else …”
Bob
> On Aug 17, 2017, at 5:36 PM, Mark Sims wrote:
>
> Cable has a DB-25 on the other end. X72 uses 26 pins. So logically it would
> be pin 26 that is missing... 10 MHz sine
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:05:47 -0600
Ed Palmer wrote:
> One source of that connector is an HP C8231A cable for a Deskjet 450.
> It's used to connect the printer to a DB-25 parallel port. The connector
> fits the X72, but there are only 25 leads in the cable. I haven't
Chris,
One source of that connector is an HP C8231A cable for a Deskjet 450.
It's used to connect the printer to a DB-25 parallel port. The connector
fits the X72, but there are only 25 leads in the cable. I haven't tried
to use it so I don't know if the missing lead is important or not.
I'm interested in a piece or two if you do this. Happy to review
schematics and layout, too. -- Christopher AI6KG
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Mark Sims wrote:
> Symmetricom sold some interface boards for the X72. They are 0.32-ish
> inch thick PCB's with a dual
Hello Attila,
I found one manufacturer which has nearly similar connectors in his
program: htk-jp.com
They have SDR and HDR connectors on stock but all of them do have 0.8 mm
pitch. The
original Molex 52660-2651 connector has 1.0 mm pitch so that would not
fit...
Am 16.08.2017 um 13:05
Re-moin,
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:01:02 +0200
Christoph Kopetzky wrote:
> I found one manufacturer which has nearly similar connectors in his
> program: htk-jp.com
> They have SDR and HDR connectors on stock but all of them do have 0.8 mm
> pitch. The
> original Molex 52660-2651
Moin,
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:15:16 +0200
Christoph Kopetzky wrote:
> I am looking without any success for some Molex plugs (52660-2651) to
> connect to my X72 time standard.
> Molex told me that these connectors are obolete since 2010.
> I made some recherches at the Molex
Hello Mark,
thanks for your info.
Does your actual version 5.0 also support the X72 rubidium oscillator?
And if not could you please send me your modified version for the X72?
Thank you in advance and
kind Regards
Chris
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:15:16 +0200
From: Christoph Kopetzky
16 matches
Mail list logo