to be difficult :)
Wouah! I'd love to have it.
-Original Message-
From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Matz
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 16:05
To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] github
Hello,
On Sun, 1
unces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Matz
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 16:05
To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] github
Hello,
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> TinyCC is great because it supports so much configurations (3 OSes, even
>>
Hello Robert,
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020, Robert Hölzl wrote:
How about a CI?
See also https://gitlab.com/giomasce/tinycc/pipelines .
I would be happy to add the corresponding scripts, so that at least windows
(x86 and x64), linux (x64) and macos (x64) are tested.
I did not investigate yet, but it
Hello,
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
TinyCC is great because it supports so much configurations (3 OSes, even
more CPU archs).
But the downside is, that nobody can ensure that his change wont break
any of these configurations.
(Probably most of us are testing only on their ow
-devel] github
Hi,
Il 18/04/20 21:05, Robert Hölzl ha scritto:
> hey guys,
>
> TinyCC is great because it supports so much configurations (3 OSes,
> even more CPU archs).
>
> But the downside is, that nobody can ensure that his change wont break
> any of these configurations
Hi,
Il 18/04/20 21:05, Robert Hölzl ha scritto:
> hey guys,
>
> TinyCC is great because it supports so much configurations (3 OSes, even
> more CPU archs).
>
> But the downside is, that nobody can ensure that his change wont break
> any of these configurations.
> (Probably most of us are testing
ssage-
From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Robert Hölzl
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 21:05
To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Tinycc-devel] github
hey guys,
TinyCC is great because it supports so much configurations (3 OSes, even
more CPU
hey guys,
TinyCC is great because it supports so much configurations (3 OSes, even
more CPU archs).
But the downside is, that nobody can ensure that his change wont break
any of these configurations.
(Probably most of us are testing only on their own PC, which is one OS
with probably x86-64)
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Karl Skomski wrote:
> > Apart from that: does github have kind of like mob branches by default?
> Because, quite frankly, that's the only reason I contributed anything,
> however small, back to tinycc. If it hadn't I still would have had fun for
> a weekend fixin
> Apart from that: does github have kind of like mob branches by default?
> Because, quite frankly, that's the only reason I contributed anything,
> however small, back to tinycc. If it hadn't I still would have had fun for a
> weekend fixing tcc, just > > > without anybody gaining anything fro
Hi,
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Karl Skomski wrote:
Hi,
I discovered tinycc some days ago but only today I discovered the
current development repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git It's
not that easy to find the most-updated tinycc repository.
I thought maybe it would be nice to switch the tinyc
Hi,
I discovered tinycc some days ago but only today I discovered the
current development repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git It's
not that easy to find the most-updated tinycc repository.
I thought maybe it would be nice to switch the tinycc repository to a
github organization? Higher goo
12 matches
Mail list logo
