[tips] Tenured or tenure-track faculty positions in Clinical, Biological and Developmental

2015-09-17 Thread Annette Taylor 
Tenured or tenure-track faculty positions in Clinical, Biological and 
Developmental Psychology (Rank open)
Ashoka University is seeking candidates for full-time faculty positions in 
clinical, biological and developmental psychology. These three positions are 
open to candidates at any level – assistant, associate, and full professor. 
Successful candidates are expected to have a commitment to teaching excellence 
and to research productivity in psychological science. At Ashoka, we emphasize 
psychology as an empirical science. The faculty hired will help shape the 
psychology department at India’s premier liberal arts university, in addition 
to offering basic courses (e.g., introductory psychology, statistics, research 
methods), and teaching upper-level courses in their areas of expertise. Ashoka 
is an English-speaking, world-class university in Delhi NCR with students who 
are comparable to the best anywhere (see 
http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/26/a-new-university-offers-liberal-arts-as-higher-education-alternative/).
Pay and research support are unparalleled in India. To apply, submit a cover 
letter, vita, teaching statement, sample syllabus, research statement, 
publication(s), and three references through the application portal (below). 
 
For inquiries, please contact Kai Qin Chan, Assistant Professor of Psychology, 
at kai.c...@ashoka.edu.in. 
 
For full consideration all materials should be submitted at 
http://ashoka.edu.in/facultypositions by October 16, 2015.


 
Ashoka University is a private, nonprofit university providing an 
international-quality liberal arts and sciences education, the first of its 
kind in India. We have attracted the brightest students and the highest-quality 
faculty to our world-class campus on the outskirts of New Delhi, India. 
Ashoka’s Young India Fellowship, in its fifth year, has become the top 
destination for Indian postgraduates and our growing Undergraduate Programme 
consists of 360 of the brightest students in India.
 
Ashoka is supported by partnerships with top universities around the world and 
an academic council of eminent scholars, all of whom are invested in building a 
new model of higher education in India through excellence in teaching and 
research. Our faculty is very diverse and consists of world-class researchers 
from premier universities (Harvard, Stanford, Oxford and others) who have made 
a mark in their respective fields, from computer science to philosophy, and are 
working to shape minds of India’s future leaders.


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Visiting Professor,
Ashoka University, Delhi, India
Professor, Psychological Sciences
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
tay...@sandiego.edu
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46800
or send a blank email to 
leave-46800-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] What think yee of the LANCET ?

2015-09-17 Thread Mike Palij 

While youse guys ah tawking about the Brits, hows about the good
ole U.S.A.?  Take a look at the following from the Sept 14, 2015
issue of JAMA:
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=2442406_source=Silverchair%20Information%20Systems_medium=email_campaign=JAMA%3AOnlineFirst09%2F14%2F2015

The reference to the above is:
Ahimastos AA, Askew C, Leicht A, et al.
Notice of Retraction: Ahimastos AA, et al. Effect of Ramipril on
Walking Times and Quality of Life Among Patients with Peripheral
Artery Disease and Intermittent Claudication: A Randomized
Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2013;309(5):453-460.. JAMA.
Published online September 14, 2015. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10811.

The article/letter is free, you just have to get through the first Ad 
page.

You can read it online or get a PDF.

The key statement may be:
|A recent internal subanalysis of these data revealed anomalies,
|which triggered an investigation and an admission of fabricated
|results by Anna A. Ahimastos, PhD, who is both the first and
|corresponding author and was responsible for data collection
|and integrity for the article.

Everything else was fine except for the data fabrication mentioned
above (skeptics might request support for those statements)

Oh, just in case anyone was wondering, the person in question
was a Ph.D., not an M.D.

-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu

P.S. At least Ahimastos got two publications out of this: the
original article and the retraction! ;-)


Michael Scoles wrote:On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:13:30 -0700.

Is your question about the quality of articles in Lancet or about the
conclusions from this particular article? And there is a difference.

On Sep 16, 2015 5:49 PM, "michael sylvester" wrote:


Ever since the Lancet was duped in printingan article about vaccines
causing autism,now some researchers in Britain are speculating that
Alzeimers' could be  contagious and transferable from patient to
caregiver:something to do with a  precursor
of the amaloid protein found in the blood.
Gimme a break. 



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46801
or send a blank email to 
leave-46801-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Quack Psychology

2015-09-17 Thread Rick Stevens 
And, darn if you didn't miss the Canadian Energy Psychology Conference.  It
was last month.

Rick Stevens
School of Behavioral and Social Sciences
University of Louisiana at Monroe


On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Jim Clark  wrote:

>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> Looks like we’re really making the big time in the field of Energy
> Psychology.  See
>
>
>
> http://www.energypsych.org/
>
>
>
> Unfortunately I was not able to find a certified practitioner up here in
> Manitoba, Canada. If only I lived in Colorado! The idea of certified energy
> psychologist reminds me of media reports a month or so ago of people being
> ripped off by fraudulent psychics, as opposed I guess to the non-fraudulent
> ones?
>
>
>
> Take care
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> Jim Clark
>
> Professor & Chair of Psychology
>
> University of Winnipeg
>
> 204-786-9757
>
> Room 4L41 (4th Floor Lockhart)
>
> www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
>
>
>
> ---
>
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: stevens.r...@gmail.com.
>
> To unsubscribe click here:
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13526.d532f8e870faf8a0d8f6433b7952f38d=T=tips=46804
>
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
>
> or send a blank email to
> leave-46804-13526.d532f8e870faf8a0d8f6433b7952f...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
>
>

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46806
or send a blank email to 
leave-46806-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

RE: [tips] Quack Psychology

2015-09-17 Thread Jim Clark 
I believe Canadian energy causes massive environmental damage through CO2 
emissions and other by-products of production, whereas USA energy causes 
earthquakes and massive environmental damage through oil spills and coal 
emissions.

On the other hand, probably the same companies control both, so is it REALLY 
Canadian or USA energy??

Take care
Jim

Jim Clark
Professor & Chair of Psychology
University of Winnipeg
204-786-9757
Room 4L41 (4th Floor Lockhart)
www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark

From: MARK CASTEEL [mailto:ma...@psu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 3:30 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] Quack Psychology



So I just have to ask. . . how is Canadian Energy different from good ole U.S. 
of A Energy? ;)

**
Mark A. Casteel, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology
Penn State York
717-771-4028
**
From: Rick Stevens 
[mailto:stevens.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 4:07 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Quack Psychology



And, darn if you didn't miss the Canadian Energy Psychology Conference.  It was 
last month.

Rick Stevens
School of Behavioral and Social Sciences
University of Louisiana at Monroe

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Jim Clark 
> wrote:


Hi

Looks like we’re really making the big time in the field of Energy Psychology.  
See

http://www.energypsych.org/

Unfortunately I was not able to find a certified practitioner up here in 
Manitoba, Canada. If only I lived in Colorado! The idea of certified energy 
psychologist reminds me of media reports a month or so ago of people being 
ripped off by fraudulent psychics, as opposed I guess to the non-fraudulent 
ones?

Take care
Jim

Jim Clark
Professor & Chair of Psychology
University of Winnipeg
204-786-9757
Room 4L41 (4th Floor Lockhart)
www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark


---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
stevens.r...@gmail.com.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13526.d532f8e870faf8a0d8f6433b7952f38d=T=tips=46804

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-46804-13526.d532f8e870faf8a0d8f6433b7952f...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: ma...@psu.edu.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13372.4251c47fdf0b43ddd1e5bf28bc6f3dba=T=tips=46806

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-46806-13372.4251c47fdf0b43ddd1e5bf28bc6f3...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: 
j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca.

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9=T=tips=46808

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)

or send a blank email to 
leave-46808-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46810
or send a blank email to 
leave-46810-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

[tips] Salivary Cortisol

2015-09-17 Thread Carol DeVolder 
Dear TIPSters,
Do any of you use salivary cortisol collection in your research? If so, do
you use an assay kit? Do you send it out to a lab? Any recommendations
would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Carol


-- 
Carol DeVolder, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
St. Ambrose University
518 West Locust Street
Davenport, Iowa  52803
563-333-6482

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46805
or send a blank email to 
leave-46805-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Not Even A Retraction

2015-09-17 Thread Christopher Green 
In the immortal words of Richard W. Smith, longtime editor of the British 
Medical Journal, "Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of 
pharmaceutical companies” (PLoS Med, 2005). 

It’s a pity that he kept that information to himself during the 25 years he 
worked for the journal, only letting the cat out of the bag after he was out 
the door. 

Chris
…..
Christopher D Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada
43.773897°, -79.503667°

chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo
...

On Sep 17, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Mike Palij  wrote:

> In 2001 the "Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent
> Psychiatry" published a research study on the treatment of depression
> in adolescents, randomized control trial (RCT) which had groups
> that received paroxetine, imipramine, or placebo -- this study
> is also known as "Study 329".  In that article it was claimed that
> paroxetine was effective and safe to use with adolescents. At that
> time there were those who questioned the research design and
> the results but the marketing of paroxetine (by the company now
> known as GlaxoSmithKline or GSK) made it widely used.
> 
> Critics of the Study 329 were able to get the original data and
> documents and they completed and published a re-analysis of
> the data which was just published in the British Medical Journal
> or BMJ.  The main conclusion: one the primary measure of
> depression, the three groups did not differ after 8 weeks of
> treatment (i.e., paroxetine vs imipramine vs placebo).  No
> effect at all.  However, the paroxetine group showed increased
> suicidal ideation and behavior while the imipramine group showed
> cardiovascular problems.  As you might imagine, all hell has
> broken loose as a result.  The popular media has picked up
> on this story and one source is (you guessed it) the New York
> Times; see:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/health/antidepressant-paxil-is-unsafe-for-teenagers-new-analysis-says.html?_r=0
> 
> The re-analysis is available on the BMJ website; see:
> http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4320
> 
> The BMJ also has an editorial that highlights some of the research
> and ethical problems associated with the research and those
> who were involved in the origin study; see:
> http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4629
> 
> The title of the editorial is:
> No correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine
> trial reanalysis raises questions about institutional responsibility
> 
> I think this study beats Milgram and Zimbardo in the unethical department.
> 
> -Mike Palij
> New York University
> m...@nyu.edu
> 
> P.S. I find the following sentence from the editorial both frightening
> and hilarious:
> 
> |The first draft of the manuscript ultimately published in the
> |Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
> |Psychiatry (JAACAP) was not written by any of the 22 named
> |authors but by an outside medical writer hired by GSK. .
> 
> There were 22 authors and the paper was originally written
> by a medical writer who probably didn't even get an authorship
> credit.
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: chri...@yorku.ca.
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62bd92=T=tips=46811
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-46811-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46813
or send a blank email to 
leave-46813-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Not Even A Retraction

2015-09-17 Thread Kenneth Steele 

That is a stunning and very depressing comment.  


Ken


> On Sep 17, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Christopher Green  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> In the immortal words of Richard W. Smith, longtime editor of the British 
> Medical Journal, "Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of 
> pharmaceutical companies” (PLoS Med, 2005). 
> 
> It’s a pity that he kept that information to himself during the 25 years he 
> worked for the journal, only letting the cat out of the bag after he was out 
> the door. 
> 
> Chris
> …..
> Christopher D Green
> Department of Psychology
> York University
> Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
> Canada
> 43.773897°, -79.503667°
> 
> chri...@yorku.ca 
> http://www.yorku.ca/christo 
> ...
> 
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Mike Palij > 
> wrote:
> 
>> In 2001 the "Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent
>> Psychiatry" published a research study on the treatment of depression
>> in adolescents, randomized control trial (RCT) which had groups
>> that received paroxetine, imipramine, or placebo -- this study
>> is also known as "Study 329".  In that article it was claimed that
>> paroxetine was effective and safe to use with adolescents. At that
>> time there were those who questioned the research design and
>> the results but the marketing of paroxetine (by the company now
>> known as GlaxoSmithKline or GSK) made it widely used.
>> 
>> Critics of the Study 329 were able to get the original data and
>> documents and they completed and published a re-analysis of
>> the data which was just published in the British Medical Journal
>> or BMJ.  The main conclusion: one the primary measure of
>> depression, the three groups did not differ after 8 weeks of
>> treatment (i.e., paroxetine vs imipramine vs placebo).  No
>> effect at all.  However, the paroxetine group showed increased
>> suicidal ideation and behavior while the imipramine group showed
>> cardiovascular problems.  As you might imagine, all hell has
>> broken loose as a result.  The popular media has picked up
>> on this story and one source is (you guessed it) the New York
>> Times; see:
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/health/antidepressant-paxil-is-unsafe-for-teenagers-new-analysis-says.html?_r=0
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> The re-analysis is available on the BMJ website; see:
>> http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4320
>> 
>> The BMJ also has an editorial that highlights some of the research
>> and ethical problems associated with the research and those
>> who were involved in the origin study; see:
>> http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4629
>> 
>> The title of the editorial is:
>> No correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine
>> trial reanalysis raises questions about institutional responsibility
>> 
>> I think this study beats Milgram and Zimbardo in the unethical department.
>> 
>> -Mike Palij
>> New York University
>> m...@nyu.edu
>> 
>> P.S. I find the following sentence from the editorial both frightening
>> and hilarious:
>> 
>> |The first draft of the manuscript ultimately published in the
>> |Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
>> |Psychiatry (JAACAP) was not written by any of the 22 named
>> |authors but by an outside medical writer hired by GSK. .
>> 
>> There were 22 authors and the paper was originally written
>> by a medical writer who probably didn't even get an authorship
>> credit.
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> You are currently subscribed to tips as: chri...@yorku.ca.
>> To unsubscribe click here: 
>> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62bd92=T=tips=46811
>> or send a blank email to 
>> leave-46811-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> ---
> 
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: steel...@appstate.edu 
> .
> 
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8c39=T=tips=46813
>  
> 
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
> 
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-46813-13524.94845a3ed9806f1cef14973830dd8...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46814
or send a blank email to 
leave-46814-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Re: [tips] Quack Psychology

2015-09-17 Thread Christopher Green 
It’s socialist energy, of course.  :-)
Chris
…..
Christopher D Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada
43.773897°, -79.503667°

chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo
...

On Sep 17, 2015, at 4:30 PM, MARK CASTEEL  wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> So I just have to ask. . . how is Canadian Energy different from good ole 
> U.S. of A Energy? ;)
>  
> **
> Mark A. Casteel, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor of Psychology
> Penn State York
> 717-771-4028
> **
> From: Rick Stevens [mailto:stevens.r...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 4:07 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: Re: [tips] Quack Psychology
>  
>  
> 
> And, darn if you didn't miss the Canadian Energy Psychology Conference.  It 
> was last month.
> 
> Rick Stevens
> School of Behavioral and Social Sciences
> University of Louisiana at Monroe
> 
>  
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Jim Clark  wrote:
>  
> 
> Hi
>  
> Looks like we’re really making the big time in the field of Energy 
> Psychology.  See
>  
> http://www.energypsych.org/
>  
> Unfortunately I was not able to find a certified practitioner up here in 
> Manitoba, Canada. If only I lived in Colorado! The idea of certified energy 
> psychologist reminds me of media reports a month or so ago of people being 
> ripped off by fraudulent psychics, as opposed I guess to the non-fraudulent 
> ones?
>  
> Take care
> Jim
>  
> Jim Clark
> Professor & Chair of Psychology
> University of Winnipeg
> 204-786-9757
> Room 4L41 (4th Floor Lockhart)
> www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
>  
> ---
> 
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: stevens.r...@gmail.com.
> 
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13526.d532f8e870faf8a0d8f6433b7952f38d=T=tips=46804
> 
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
> 
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-46804-13526.d532f8e870faf8a0d8f6433b7952f...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
>  
> ---
> 
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: ma...@psu.edu.
> 
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13372.4251c47fdf0b43ddd1e5bf28bc6f3dba=T=tips=46806
> 
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
> 
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-46806-13372.4251c47fdf0b43ddd1e5bf28bc6f3...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> ---
> 
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: chri...@yorku.ca.
> 
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62bd92=T=tips=46808
> 
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
> 
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-46808-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46812
or send a blank email to 
leave-46812-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

[tips] Not Even A Retraction

2015-09-17 Thread Mike Palij 

In 2001 the "Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry" published a research study on the treatment of depression
in adolescents, randomized control trial (RCT) which had groups
that received paroxetine, imipramine, or placebo -- this study
is also known as "Study 329".  In that article it was claimed that
paroxetine was effective and safe to use with adolescents. At that
time there were those who questioned the research design and
the results but the marketing of paroxetine (by the company now
known as GlaxoSmithKline or GSK) made it widely used.

Critics of the Study 329 were able to get the original data and
documents and they completed and published a re-analysis of
the data which was just published in the British Medical Journal
or BMJ.  The main conclusion: one the primary measure of
depression, the three groups did not differ after 8 weeks of
treatment (i.e., paroxetine vs imipramine vs placebo).  No
effect at all.  However, the paroxetine group showed increased
suicidal ideation and behavior while the imipramine group showed
cardiovascular problems.  As you might imagine, all hell has
broken loose as a result.  The popular media has picked up
on this story and one source is (you guessed it) the New York
Times; see:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/health/antidepressant-paxil-is-unsafe-for-teenagers-new-analysis-says.html?_r=0

The re-analysis is available on the BMJ website; see:
http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4320

The BMJ also has an editorial that highlights some of the research
and ethical problems associated with the research and those
who were involved in the origin study; see:
http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4629

The title of the editorial is:
No correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine
trial reanalysis raises questions about institutional responsibility

I think this study beats Milgram and Zimbardo in the unethical 
department.


-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu

P.S. I find the following sentence from the editorial both frightening
and hilarious:

|The first draft of the manuscript ultimately published in the
|Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
|Psychiatry (JAACAP) was not written by any of the 22 named
|authors but by an outside medical writer hired by GSK. .

There were 22 authors and the paper was originally written
by a medical writer who probably didn't even get an authorship
credit.


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5=T=tips=46811
or send a blank email to 
leave-46811-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu