A few comments on the Einstein/Maric correspondence: I've now received the
translated letters (Renn and Schulmann, 1992). Something not apparent from
the Lukacs article on which I have commented at length (30 November) is
the preponderance of letters by Einstein in the collection (43 by Einstein
co
Title: Re: Mileva Maric yet again
At 7:37 PM -0500 11/30/05, Allen Esterson wrote:
Oops! That should have read:
Thanks, Don, for injecting a welcome dose of common sense into the
debate,
something notably lacking in the great bulk of the writings by
proponents
of the "COLLABORATION&qu
Oops! That should have read:
Thanks, Don, for injecting a welcome dose of common sense into the debate,
something notably lacking in the great bulk of the writings by proponents
of the "COLLABORATION" thesis.
Allen E.
-
> Don Allen wrote [snip]:
> > If
of the "corroboration" thesis.
Allen Esterson.
-
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:21:43 -0800
Author: Don Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mileva Maric yet again
> While I can't comment with sophistication on the physics mentioned in
> this
While I can't comment with sophistication on the physics mentioned in
this thread I have to ask a simple question from a human nature
perspective. Having gone through a divorce (and having seen many others
do the same) it seems impossible to imagine a scenario in which the
"injured" party accep
On 28 November Stephen Black wrote:
> Lukacs, B. (Date?) Some notes on Mileva Marity, later Mileva Einstein from the
> viewpoint of a Hungarian relativist. At
> http://www.rmki.kfki.hu/~lukacs/MARITY.htm
>
> This is one of the more intriguing things I've come across. It's the work of a
> Hungari
Some comments on "Inviting Women to Physics and Engineering", by M. C.
Sequeira and J. D. Baptista.
http://tinyurl.com/e4op2
Page 10: I shall slip quickly past the comment about Einstein and Mileva
discussing "in great detail the work of Lenard, Hertz, Drude, Boltmann,
Kirchhoff and Planck", a
An addendum to my last posting, relating to the inflated claim made by
Evan Harris Walker about Mileva Maric's supposed contributions to
Einstein's epoch-making 1905 paper on the photoelectric arising from her
attending the lectures of Lenard at Heidelberg in 1899. Here is an extract
from a letter
I am grateful (as authors say in responses to reviews of their books
containing critical comments!) to Stephen (28 November) for raising points
for discussion. I'll do my best in this posting to cover as much ground as
possible, but the couple of v. lengthy pdf files he found will have to be
dealt
