Re: [Tlf-devel] fldigi tlf

2007-11-23 Thread Wilbert Knol

 What's this magic called winkeyer?

That (or something similar) is what W1EL calls it. If I recall rightly, it 
consists of a PIC micro-controller that produces dots and dashes from 
paddles. In addition, the keyer connects to the PC, from which it receives 
ASCII to be transmitted as CW.

The PC can tell the keyer to speed up or slow down using (escaped) commands. 
Also, the keyer sends back status messages, so the PC knows what's being 
sent.

From memory, the keyer has some refinements. It can extend the leading 
dot/dash to compensate for amplifier key-up delay. This is a good idea, 
because amps with mechanical relays (with tunsten contacts ;-) can take up to 
30 ms to come in-line, and that's more than enough to stuff up the leading 
character.

As far as I can tell, the only thing the keyer has in common with 'windows' is 
the closed sources. I believe the command/status protocol is published.

 Is it affordable?

Last time I looked the keyer kit was pretty reasonable.

 Is this what the hot shots are using?  

Well, Rein's got one :-)
No doubt using a hardware keyer takes considerable load off the CPU. And you 
can use VOX with slow amps and not truncate the first character. So I guess 
it would be useful at multi-op stations.

Having said that, at pop-gun ZL6QH we've always used software keyers (DOS CT, 
and later Writelog/Win98) and there have never been reported problems with 
hiccups or dropouts in the CW at contest speeds of 28-34 WPM.

Wilbert, ZL2BSJ


___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel


Re: [Tlf-devel] fldigi tlf

2007-11-23 Thread Joop Stakenborg

Op vrijdag 23-11-2007 om 04:27 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Martin
Kratoska:
 Tlf - I believe any ideas to run it with fldigi or similar program is 
 meaningless until the principal bugs became fixed. See here:
 
 http://www.ok1rr.com/tlf-bugs/index.html
 
 It is rather uneasy to say that the latest tlf 0.9.30 is more than a 
 year old (better said 1,5) and the development seems to be stopped. I 
 would appreciate if Rein would inform us about the tlf future. There is 
 not very strong need of new features (but, of course, it will be highly 
 appreciated) but a bugfix version is more than needed.
 

I would like to work on it, once I have some other things sorted out.
Problem is, Rein's code isn't very easy to read. I am not trying to
critize Rein, but I now myself how hard it is to write software which is
understandable to other people.

 My apologies for my unpleasant comments.
 

They were not unpleasant to me I liked the technical details of
compiling a kernel which can handle 60 wpm. ;-)

 73,
 Martin, OK1RR
 
 


Joop, PG4I



___
Tlf-devel mailing list
Tlf-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel