Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites

> A stable, publicly available document is basically an RFC. Not always; ISO et al. ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] Call for consensus: Removing 0-RTT client auth

Hi Sean & Joe, On Tue, March 29, 2016 5:59 am, Sean Turner wrote: > All, > > To make sure we’ve got a clear way forward coming out of our BA > sessions, we need to make sure there’s consensus on a couple of > outstanding issues. So... > > It seems that there is a clear consensus not to

Re: [TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile vs HTTP/2.0

> On 3 Apr 2016, at 8:44 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > > On 3 April 2016 at 18:18, Peter Gutmann wrote: >> I think the reason why there's no rationale is because there's no rational >> explanation for lumping

Re: [TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile vs HTTP/2.0

On 3 April 2016 at 18:18, Peter Gutmann wrote: > I think the reason why there's no rationale is because there's no rational > explanation for lumping TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 in with the likes > of TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5. You evidently believe that a