On 2 March 2016 at 14:39, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> Reading this over, I wonder if we're talking about the same thing. It's
> probably my fault for
> using the word "self-contained" here, so in the interest of clarifying, what
> I meant here was
> "separate".
Yes, separate was my thought.
> Spec
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Martin Thomson
wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 13:55, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > I think a "safer" profile of TLS, as in "implement the following features
> > (section XXX, YYY) and not the following (section ZZZ)" then that seems
> like
> > something that might potenti
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 13:55, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> I think a "safer" profile of TLS, as in "implement the following features
>> (section XXX, YYY) and not the following (section ZZZ)" then that seems like
>> something that might potentially b
On 2 March 2016 at 13:55, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I think a "safer" profile of TLS, as in "implement the following features
> (section XXX, YYY) and not the following (section ZZZ)" then that seems like
> something that might potentially be a useful exercise. Depending on length,
> this might event
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Watson Ladd wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
> > At the TRON workshop [0], we (Joe and Sean) were asked to provide our
> views about the status and timeline for TLS 1.3; we wanted to share the
> same information with the WG.
> >
> > Bef
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
> At the TRON workshop [0], we (Joe and Sean) were asked to provide our views
> about the status and timeline for TLS 1.3; we wanted to share the same
> information with the WG.
>
> Before that though, we want to thank the researchers for the t
On 2/29/16 at 6:45 AM, s...@sn3rd.com (Sean Turner) wrote:
One thing that was reinforced at TRON and we think the TLS WG
should be aware of is that the research community needs time to
do their analysis. With that in mind, the chairs are very
strongly leaning towards an extended WGLC of 6 wee
At the TRON workshop [0], we (Joe and Sean) were asked to provide our views
about the status and timeline for TLS 1.3; we wanted to share the same
information with the WG.
Before that though, we want to thank the researchers for the time they put into
analyzing the protocol as well as the TRON
