On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have pushed out a new version of the document describing EdDSA public
> keys, signatures and certificates for PKIX. The change in -03 include
> the addition of the prehash mode, test vectors generated by GnuTLS, and
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 15:27 +0300, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
> 4) For TLS PoP signatures, does it make sense to use HashEdDSA at
> all?
> Another way would to always use PureEdDSA and perform hash separtion
> from TLS side (e.g. sign(privkey, hash_func_id|H(tbs_data))).
> The certificate signatures
Josefsson
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Updated EdDSA/Ed25519 PKIX document
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 15:27 +0300, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
> 4) For TLS PoP signatures, does it make sense to use HashEdDSA at
> all?
> Another way would to always use PureEdDSA and perform hash separtion
> f
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:03:28PM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 15:27 +0300, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
>
> > 4) For TLS PoP signatures, does it make sense to use HashEdDSA at
> > all?
> > Another way would to always use PureEdDSA and perform hash separtion
> > from
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 18:26 +0300, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:03:28PM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 15:27 +0300, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
> >
> > > 4) For TLS PoP signatures, does it make sense to use HashEdDSA at
> > > all?
> > > Another
Hi all,
I have pushed out a new version of the document describing EdDSA public
keys, signatures and certificates for PKIX. The change in -03 include
the addition of the prehash mode, test vectors generated by GnuTLS, and
a section recommending certain human readable names.