Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Adam Langley
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tony Arcieri wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Adam Langley > wrote: > >> If it wants to be a technical document, then the draft includes two very >> different designs with a note saying that one will be chosen

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-record-limit

2017-08-04 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
It is currently before 20170818, and I support adoption of this draft and am willing to review it as it progresses. I do agree with Ilari that limiting the ciphertext size seems to make more sense, but of course we can discuss that post adoption. -Ben On 08/04/2017 07:50 AM, Sean Turner wrote:

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Adam Langley
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Sean Turner wrote: > At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt > draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption [0]. We need to confirm this support on > the list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the > draft and

[TLS] WG Call for Adoption of draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts continued

2017-08-04 Thread Joseph Salowey
In the previous call for adoption there were some issues raised that needed more discussion. The summary sent to the list [1] and subsequent discussions indicate support for the approach outlined in this draft. Therefore we would like to continue the call for adoption. If you have concerns

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Tony Arcieri
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Adam Langley wrote: > If it wants to be a technical document, then the draft includes two very > different designs with a note saying that one will be chosen at some point. > So which are we talking about adopting? While drafts evolve

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Christian Huitema
On 8/4/2017 10:39 AM, Adam Langley wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Sean Turner > wrote: > > At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt > draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption [0]. We need to confirm this > support on

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Tom Ritter
On Aug 4, 2017 9:22 AM, "Daniel Kahn Gillmor" wrote: On Fri 2017-08-04 08:50:33 -0400, Sean Turner wrote: > At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt > draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption [0]. We need to confirm this support > on the list so please let

[TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-record-limit

2017-08-04 Thread Sean Turner
At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt draft-thomson-tls-record-limit [0]. We need to confirm this support on the list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170818. If you object to

[TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Sean Turner
At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption [0]. We need to confirm this support on the list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170818. If you object

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2017-08-04 08:50:33 -0400, Sean Turner wrote: > At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt > draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption [0]. We need to confirm this support > on the list so please let the list know whether you support adoption > of the draft and are willing to

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Stephen Farrell
On 04/08/17 14:21, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Fri 2017-08-04 08:50:33 -0400, Sean Turner wrote: >> At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt >> draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption [0]. We need to confirm this support >> on the list so please let the list know whether you

Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption-00.txt

2017-08-04 Thread Brian Sniffen
Having promised a review before August 18, I have three issues I'd like to talk about. But first, thanks for keeping pushing on this. I am not sure it will ever see wide adoption, but we'll surely never find out if we don't try. ## Don't stand out I think the requirement that the browser

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Christopher Wood
I also support adoption, have reviewed it, and will continue to do so. Best, Chris On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Ben Schwartz wrote: > I support adoption and have reviewed the draft. > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Farrell > wrote:

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: SNI Encryption

2017-08-04 Thread Brian Sniffen
Sean Turner writes: > At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt > draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption [0]. We need to confirm this support on the > list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft > and are willing to review/comment

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-record-limit

2017-08-04 Thread Ilari Liusvaara
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 08:50:31AM -0400, Sean Turner wrote: > At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt > draft-thomson-tls-record-limit [0]. We need to confirm this > support on the list so please let the list know whether you support > adoption of the draft and are willing