The discussion on the list has not changed the consensus from the IETF 95
meeting, 0-RTT client authentication should be removed from the draft.
Cheers,
J&S
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
> All,
>
> To make sure we’ve got a clear way forward coming out of our BA sessions,
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Cached Information Extension'
(draft-ietf-tls-cached-info-23.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Transport Layer Security Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Stephen Farrell and Kat
Hi Magnus,
The revision addresses the comments I had. If anyone else still has
concerns please respond this week.
Thanks,
Joe
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> TLS WG,
> (Cc AVTCORE WG)
>
> When AVTCORE run a WG last call earlier this
Reviving this thread, I also think it would also be a good idea if 1.3 did
not stripping zeros from Z. Having this logic is rather dubious w.r.t.
treating secret data in constant-time. And as Bill Cox mentioned elsewhere
in this thread, this odd behavior has caused interoperability issues in the
pa
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-falsestart-02: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
