Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors

[Xiaoyin Liu]

+1

From: Richard Barnes
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 2:11 PM
To: Eric Rescorla
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors

+1

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Eric Rescorla 
> wrote:
+1

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Sean Turner 
> wrote:
All,

There's been some interest on the list and more in Seoul to adopt 
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors/ as a TLS WG 
item.  We marked the draft as a "Candidate for WG Adoption" in the datatracker, 
but now it's time to officially do the WG call for adoption.  So, if you would 
like for this draft to become a WG document and you are willing to review 
various versions as it moves through the process, then please let the list know 
by December 21st.  If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say 
so (and say why).

Cheers,

J
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls


___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls


___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors

[Benjamin Kaduk]

I think we should adopt the document.  I'm happy to review the document,
though I don't expect to be validating the vectors themselves.

-Ben

On 12/08/2016 12:05 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> All,
>
> There’s been some interest on the list and more in Seoul to adopt 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors/ as a TLS WG 
> item.  We marked the draft as a "Candidate for WG Adoption” in the 
> datatracker, but now it’s time to officially do the WG call for adoption.  
> So, if you would like for this draft to become a WG document and you are 
> willing to review various versions as it moves through the process, then 
> please let the list know by December 21st.  If you are opposed to this being 
> a WG document, please say so (and say why).
>
> Cheers,
>
> J
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-davidben-tls-grease

[Adam Langley]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Eric Rescorla  wrote:

> +1
>

I'm not sure whether I could as an independent voice on this topic, but I
strongly support adoption of this draft.


Cheers

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley a...@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors

[Richard Barnes]

+1

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Eric Rescorla  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Sean Turner  wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> There’s been some interest on the list and more in Seoul to adopt
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors/ as a
>> TLS WG item.  We marked the draft as a "Candidate for WG Adoption” in the
>> datatracker, but now it’s time to officially do the WG call for adoption.
>> So, if you would like for this draft to become a WG document and you are
>> willing to review various versions as it moves through the process, then
>> please let the list know by December 21st.  If you are opposed to this
>> being a WG document, please say so (and say why).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> J
>> ___
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
>
>
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-davidben-tls-grease

[Jana Iyengar]

I'm very supportive of this draft being adopted. FWIW, I'd love to see
similar mechanisms in other protocols as well.

- jana

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Sean Turner  wrote:

> All,
>
> There’s been some interest on the list in http://datatracker.ietf.org/
> doc/draft-davidben-tls-grease/ (aka
> Applying Generate Random Extensions And Sustain Extensibility to TLS
> Extensibility).  We’d like to determine whether there’s enough interest to
> adopt the draft as a WG item.  So, if you would like for this draft to
> become a WG document and you are willing to review various versions as it
> moves through the process, then please let the list know by December 21st.
> If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why).
>
> Cheers,
>
> J
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

[TLS] WG adoption call: draft-davidben-tls-grease

[Sean Turner]

All,

There’s been some interest on the list in 
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davidben-tls-grease/ (aka 
Applying Generate Random Extensions And Sustain Extensibility to TLS 
Extensibility).  We’d like to determine whether there’s enough interest to 
adopt the draft as a WG item.  So, if you would like for this draft to become a 
WG document and you are willing to review various versions as it moves through 
the process, then please let the list know by December 21st. If you are opposed 
to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why).

Cheers,

J
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

[TLS] WG adoption call: draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors

[Sean Turner]

All,

There’s been some interest on the list and more in Seoul to adopt 
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-tls-tls13-vectors/ as a TLS WG 
item.  We marked the draft as a "Candidate for WG Adoption” in the datatracker, 
but now it’s time to officially do the WG call for adoption.  So, if you would 
like for this draft to become a WG document and you are willing to review 
various versions as it moves through the process, then please let the list know 
by December 21st.  If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say 
so (and say why).

Cheers,

J
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls