Re: [TLS] GREASE and TLS 1.3

> On Jan 18, 2017, at 17:49, David Benjamin wrote: > > Do people agree with this plan? Looks like we got general agreement this is a good approach to follow. spt ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org

[TLS] Issues and PRs for draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates

I submitted a PR to address some editorial issues: https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates/pull/5 I also created an issue/PR that adds a “recommended" column for exporters; its another registry that could use it. I followed the same model as the CS registry, namely put a

Re: [TLS] Wireshark Download for TLS1.3

On 26 January 2017 at 16:31, Peter Wu wrote: > Hi all, > > This is indeed work in progress, the current state can be tracked at: > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12779 > > Note for TLS implementers: Wireshark supports decryption when provided > with the

Re: [TLS] Wireshark Download for TLS1.3

Hi all, This is indeed work in progress, the current state can be tracked at: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12779 Note for TLS implementers: Wireshark supports decryption when provided with the master secret (TLS 1.2 and before), but with TLS 1.3 there are more secrets. The

[TLS] Wireshark Download for TLS1.3

All, If you want to download a WorkInProgress version of Wireshark that supports TLS1.3 (latest version of draft -18 only!). Please go to: https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ THIS IS NOT THE PRODUCTION VERSION OF WIRESHARK!!! We owe HUGE thanks to Peter Wu & Alexis La Goutte (core