On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 01:44:28AM +, Wang Haiguang wrote:
> Dear ilari,
>
> Thanks very much for the reply :-）. Please see my comments inline below.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ilariliusva...@welho.com [mailto:ilariliusva...@welho.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:17 PM
>
I'd encourage you to try get people to be open about
things here - there's no particular shame in having 10% TLSv1.0
sessions after all:-)
It isn't a question of shame but it is just a bit too much information
to provide a potential adversary. That is, to say that Stock Exchange XYZ
has n%
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5246,
"The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5409
--
Status: Rejected
