On Wednesday, 27 February 2019 13:52:57 CET Stephen Farrell wrote:
> On 27/02/2019 12:30, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > I'm not sure which part for the key_share extension you mean as being
> > empty, but the key_exchange in the KeyShareEntry can't be empty, per RFC
> > 8446,>
> > Section 4.2.8:
> >
On 27/02/2019 12:30, Hubert Kario wrote:
> I'm not sure which part for the key_share extension you mean as being empty,
> but the key_exchange in the KeyShareEntry can't be empty, per RFC 8446,
> Section 4.2.8:
>
> struct {
> NamedGroup group;
> opaque
On Wednesday, 27 February 2019 09:54:17 CET Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> On 27/02/2019 01:57, Sean Turner wrote:
> > This messages closes the WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-grease. The draft
> > will progress as is because we received no WGLC comments.
>
> Apologies
Hiya,
On 27/02/2019 01:57, Sean Turner wrote:
> This messages closes the WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-grease. The draft
> will progress as is because we received no WGLC comments.
Apologies for missing the WGLC. I've just read this and fully
support it progressing. I have one question
This messages closes the WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-grease. The draft will
progress as is because we received no WGLC comments.
spt
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 10:50, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> This is the working group last call for the "Applying GREASE to TLS
> Extensibility
This is the working group last call for the "Applying GREASE to TLS
Extensibility" draft available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-grease/. Please review the
document and send your comments to the list by 2359 UTC on 8 February 2019.
NOTE: There is one outstanding issue
