Re: [TLS] how close are we?

[Sean Turner]

> On Oct 11, 2016, at 23:21, Peter Gutmann  wrote:
> 
> Xiaoyin Liu  writes:
> 
>> Not directly related to Rich's question, but will we settle the "TLS 1.3 -> 
>> TLS 2.0" 
>> discussion (PR #612) before WGLC? Or has this already been closed as 
>> "keeping 
>> the current name"?
> 
> The impression I got from the discussion was that most people, or at least 
> those who
> contributed, wanted 2.0, or at least something other than 1.3.  I was kinda 
> surprised 
> to see it still being referred to as 1.3.
> 
> Peter.

It’s still in the queue.  The chairs felt it best to focus on the open 
technical issues.

spt 
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] how close are we?

[Peter Gutmann]

Xiaoyin Liu  writes:

>Not directly related to Rich's question, but will we settle the "TLS 1.3 -> 
>TLS 2.0" 
>discussion (PR #612) before WGLC? Or has this already been closed as "keeping 
>the current name"?

The impression I got from the discussion was that most people, or at least 
those who
contributed, wanted 2.0, or at least something other than 1.3.  I was kinda 
surprised 
to see it still being referred to as 1.3.

Peter.

___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] how close are we?

[Eric Rescorla]

I've got a bunch of PRs in flight that I think we need to resolve one way
or the other.
I'm expecting the chairs to address those shortly and if all goes well with
that I'll put
out -17 next week and then we should revisit this question.

Best,
-Ekr


On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Salz, Rich  wrote:

> I’ve been away, and sick, for most of the post three weeks.
>
>
>
> How close is this ready to WGLC?  Is it really just polishing the shiny
> bits?  I mean I can kinda understand that, but also parts of this seems
> like lsat-midnight late-night hacking.
>
>
>
> Looking for some input here.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
>
> Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
>
> IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
>
>
>
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] how close are we?

[Xiaoyin Liu]

Not directly related to Rich's question, but will we settle the "TLS 1.3 -> TLS 
2.0" discussion (PR #612<https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/612>) before 
WGLC? Or has this already been closed as "keeping the current name"?


Best,

Xiaoyin



From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:23 PM
To: tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] how close are we?


I've been away, and sick, for most of the post three weeks.



How close is this ready to WGLC?  Is it really just polishing the shiny bits?  
I mean I can kinda understand that, but also parts of this seems like 
lsat-midnight late-night hacking.



Looking for some input here.





--

Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies

Member, OpenSSL Dev Team

IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz


___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

[TLS] how close are we?

[Salz, Rich]

I've been away, and sick, for most of the post three weeks.

How close is this ready to WGLC?  Is it really just polishing the shiny bits?  
I mean I can kinda understand that, but also parts of this seems like 
lsat-midnight late-night hacking.

Looking for some input here.


--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz

___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls