> On Oct 11, 2016, at 23:21, Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Xiaoyin Liu <[email protected]> writes: > >> Not directly related to Rich's question, but will we settle the "TLS 1.3 -> >> TLS 2.0" >> discussion (PR #612) before WGLC? Or has this already been closed as >> "keeping >> the current name"? > > The impression I got from the discussion was that most people, or at least > those who > contributed, wanted 2.0, or at least something other than 1.3. I was kinda > surprised > to see it still being referred to as 1.3. > > Peter.
It’s still in the queue. The chairs felt it best to focus on the open technical issues. spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
