It doesn't look like we have enough consensus to adopt this proposal.
Thanks,
J&S
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Chairs: Can you advise on the disposition of this?
>
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Martin Thomson
> wrote:
>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 12:07
Chairs: Can you advise on the disposition of this?
-Ekr
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Martin Thomson
wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 12:07, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > I assume you would prefer hex, i.e., 0x0303?
>
> Yeah, that would be nice: it's recognizably the same as the old one that
> wa
On 13 October 2016 at 12:07, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I assume you would prefer hex, i.e., 0x0303?
Yeah, that would be nice: it's recognizably the same as the old one that way.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Martin Thomson
wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 10:00, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > I would prefer we not merge this PR.
>
> I concur, though I would prefer if we stopped using the strange { 3, 3
> } notation for versions, it's not useful and it implies a significance
On 13 October 2016 at 11:59, Dave Garrett wrote:
> One added feature we get with this registry definition is a range of
> codepoints for private experimental use. Formal definition might not be
> strictly needed here, though it shouldn't hurt.
The same can be achieved by saying "future versions
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 07:00:34 pm Eric Rescorla wrote:
> This PR involves two changes:
>
> 1. Attaching the term "ID" to version and defining new enum code points.
> 2. Creating a registry
>
> The first of these seems obfuscatory and unhelpful. The second just seems
> unnecessary. Other
On 13 October 2016 at 10:00, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I would prefer we not merge this PR.
I concur, though I would prefer if we stopped using the strange { 3, 3
} notation for versions, it's not useful and it implies a significance
to the separation that just doesn't exist*.
[*] One caveat: you w
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> Al,
>
> David Garrett has generated PR#634 (https://github.com/tlswg/
> tls13-spec/pull/634) to "explicitly [rename] the protocol version fields
> as IDs and defines a registry for all values, as they're really just
> arbitrary codepoints at t
> David Garrett has generated PR#634 (https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-
> spec/pull/634)
+1
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Al,
David Garrett has generated PR#634
(https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/634) to "explicitly [rename] the
protocol version fields as IDs and defines a registry for all values, as
they're really just arbitrary codepoints at this point.” Note that there are
no bits on the wire changes a
10 matches
Mail list logo