DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8582] New: - Can't Post to Tomcat 4 from separate Application

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8582. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7520] - Tomcat starts with title 3.3 instead of 3.3.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7520. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8583] - /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: for mod_webapp.so

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8583. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8586] New: - Remote deployment of war file using /manager fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8586. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Resend: SSL portability and Coyote

Nick Betteridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric Rescorla wrote: This didn't make it out the first time so I'm resending... I'm looking at what needs to be done to make the 3.3 SSL portablity stuff work properly with Coyote. For the most part, this work has been done--if you set the

[FAQ] jGuru FAQ Update

jGuru maintains FAQs and Forums on Servlets, JSP, and Tomcat (as well as many other Java topics). Here is an automated update on recent postings to Tomcat-related FAQs. Please direct flames and feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . - Alex

Re: Resend: SSL portability and Coyote

Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED] I assume you mean actions. They are defined in o.a.c.ActionCode, and processed by somebody implementing o.a.c.ActionHook (both under the coyote directory). For the HTTP/1.1 connector, this is

jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries

A while back, I responded to Henri Gomez's email: We will create really soon webpages for jakarta-tomcat-connectors with an offer to summarize some of the recent discussion about the various connectors currently available for Tomcat. Not to write new docs, just summarize the existing

Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..

Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to compile the latest from cvs. My question is do you think that what you're working on could

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8588] New: - Tomcat 4.0.3 directory redirection 302 returns wrong Location

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8588. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8590] New: - WebappLoader doesn't honor loaderClass attribute from server.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8590. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8583] - /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: for mod_webapp.so

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8583. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..

Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35. Question: when you say Yes, that's right... do you mean yes that's right, the socketpool work may solve bug

Re: Tomcat 4.1 release and Jasper 2 problems

I built Tomcat 4.1 with Jasper 2 from CVS a few days ago and encountered a number of problems with the JSP's in the example web app. I recommend testing the 4.1.0 build first if you want to test 4.1. At least this rules out possible build errors. A number of the JSP's returned empty pages

Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..

Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35. You _need_ to use the APR libraries shipped with your Apache 2.0

Tomcat JASPER Stop Reloading

Hi Guys, I asked this question before but I didn't get any answer, is there is a configuration to disable JASPER checking of the timestamp on the JSP page each request, it is an important configurtion in a production envirnoment where things seldom changes, it is the same concept as the

[NITPICK] didn't see this one coming...

context file=/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/webapp.xml pbIMPORTANT NOTE: The Webapp connector is now deprecated. Use the Coyote JK 2 connector instead./b/p /context I'm just asking why??? Just because it doesn't use Coyote? Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server

Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..

Well I changed the apr libs I was using and had the same errors. I'm using the Worker MPM. Side Note: I would also like to know why the webapp connector is being deprecated. It may need a little work, but it's ease of configuration is a great feature. I am concerned with it's performance

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8596] New: - Catalina doesn't follow symlinks across filesystems (TC 4.0.2 RH 7.2 jdk1.3.1-0x)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8596. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8596] - Catalina doesn't follow symlinks across filesystems (TC 4.0.3 RH 7.2 jdk1.3.1-0x)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8596. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c

nacho 02/04/27 17:19:27 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c Log: * Use uriEnv-workerName for logs Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriEnv.c Index: jk_uriEnv.c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8596] - Catalina doesn't follow symlinks across filesystems (TC 4.0.3 RH 7.2 jdk1.3.1-0x)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8596. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4042] - webapp component requires Port directive versus Listen directive

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4042. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

mod_jk2

Hi, When I try to run make in jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 I get a compile error. One of the errors is: gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-pic' Does this mean that I´ve got the wrong version of gcc? I´ve got v2.95 installed. I would really like to get mod_jk2 compiled