DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11822.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11822.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hola a Todos:
Back from holidays, ;)
De: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 10:52
Para: Tomcat Developers List
Asunto: Re: need examples for mod_jk/mod_jk2 conf and properties
Jason Corley wrote:
I have nothing to offer personally, but I did
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Not acked
It is even more broken than his description.
But I have not enough Karma for this ;-(
+++
jfclere@vtxclere:~/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site cvs commit sourceindex.xml
Enter passphrase for RSA key 'jfclere@vtxclere':
Access denied: Insufficient Karma
Hi,
I propose the attached patch...
Cheers
Jean-frederic
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Not acked
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jørgen Nørgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Aug 20, 2002 14:17:23 Europe/London
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Broken link
On
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
Hola a Todos:
Back from holidays, ;)
De: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 10:52
Para: Tomcat Developers List
Asunto: Re: need examples for mod_jk/mod_jk2 conf and properties
Jason Corley wrote:
I have nothing to
hgomez 2002/08/28 02:55:11
Modified:jk/native/common jk_global.h
Log:
First fixes for iSeries (AS/400)
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_global.h
Index: jk_global.h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glenn 2002/08/26 05:15:59
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
RequestBase.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
Log:
Fix for BUG
I plan, as announced last week, to tag the 4.1.10 release soon. I
consider it as a RC, and we can see what are the issues that we would
see as must-fix before stable.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12111.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/08/28 03:05:05
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
WebappClassLoader.java
Log:
- Fix bug where external repositories were not used.
Patch submitted by David Oxley dave at staffplanner.co.uk
- getURL returned invalid
Hello,
I've been working so far with Solaris 8 and Tomcat 4.0.4. I use only ROOT context
to deploy several servlets. As the servlets need to be in in a precise
directory in the system, I created a symbolic link from
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/ROOT/WEB_INF/classes to
the directory where the
remm2002/08/28 04:03:45
Modified:.build.properties.sample
Log:
- Update revision numbers.
Revision ChangesPath
1.49 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/build.properties.sample
Index: build.properties.sample
Hi,
I'm testing 4.1.10-dev before tagging, and I ran into some serious problems.
Jasper 2 seems broken (in the TC 4 branch; the HEAD/TC 5 branch may be
broken as well, but I didn't have time to test it), and fails to compile
most pages from the admin webapp.
There seems to be a problem with
remm2002/08/28 04:53:10
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
- Update release notes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +62 -16jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
remm2002/08/28 05:03:16
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
Log:
- Add swallowOutput flag, to allow disabling/enabling sys.out and sys.err
redirection to the logger.
- Redirection is disabled by default.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glenn 2002/08/26 05:15:59
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
RequestBase.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
remm2002/08/28 05:09:07
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config context.xml
Log:
- Add swallowOutput flag in the docs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +7 -0 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/context.xml
Index: context.xml
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glenn 2002/08/26 05:15:59
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
RequestBase.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7082.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glenn 2002/08/26 05:15:59
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
RequestBase.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
Before a 4.1.10 release I want to get the jk docs updated, they don't have info
on some of the features I added last spring. I'll try to get that done today.
Regards,
Glenn
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I plan, as announced last week, to tag the 4.1.10 release soon. I
consider it as a RC, and we
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Capturing of stdout/stderr has been enabled in Tomcat 4.1 for 2-3 months
now.
I don't think it was, as RequestBase is deprecated, and is not used
anymore (except in the old connectors).
What I committed was a bug fix. If you revert it, capturing
stderr/stdout code
Remy,
Never mind. Have just seen your commits! Easier than my solution! :) Thanks
for getting it into 4.1.
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: David Oxley
Sent: 28 August 2002 13:05
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: Bug in WebappClassLoader
Remy,
Here's the new patch. Has
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Craig,
I think this bug report is invalid, since Tomcat/Apache has no knowledge
of load balancers and firewalls, so it is unrealistic to expect to
return port numbers that it doesn't know about. What do you think?
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12052
Other opinions welcome
glenn 2002/08/28 06:33:18
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config jk.xml
Log:
Update jk docs with latest features
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +99 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/jk.xml
Index: jk.xml
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Capturing of stdout/stderr has been enabled in Tomcat 4.1 for 2-3
months now.
I don't think it was, as RequestBase is deprecated, and is not used
anymore (except in the old connectors).
What I committed was a bug fix. If you revert it,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:43, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Before a 4.1.10 release I want to get the jk docs updated, they don't have info
on some of the features I added last spring. I'll try to get that done today.
Also, the docs for jk2 apache (1 or 2) could be enhanced.
--
Brian Millett
I have built Tomcat from jakarta-tomcat-4.0 cvs module and all necessary
subprojects.
When I am trying to start it raises an exception:
Catalina.start: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
Hey all,
I'm new to Bugzilla so forgive me if you know about this. I
posted this bug against TC 4.1.8 a couple weeks ago but I'm not
sure if there is something else I should do to get it in the Bug
Queue.
Right now its status is UNCONFIRMED (although *I* am pretty
sure about it).
Is it
This line of conversation is best in tomcat-user; Pick it up there
- Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Dev Zero G Ltd team [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 4 nightly build doesn't starts
I have built
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 28 Aug 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Date: 28 Aug 2002 23:27:18 +1000
From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Dev List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
Craig,
I think this bug report is invalid, since
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
On 28 Aug 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Date: 28 Aug 2002 23:27:18 +1000
From: Bojan
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Trollinger wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:19:19 -0400
From: John Trollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
-Original
bobh2002/08/28 10:04:08
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config manager.xml
Log:
Removed documentation for maxInactiveInterval since setting it is pointless
(it is overridden be either the webapp web.xml or the tomcat wide conf/web.xml)
Revision ChangesPath
1.3
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Trollinger wrote:
Consider Apache running on port 80, forwarding to Tomcat on
8009 (the default setup). I think it's reasonable for the
application developer to assume that getServerPort() is going
to return 80 and not 8009, because they should conceptually
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Are you ok with a change for daemon to use introspection, and remove the
dependency from tomcat to daemon plus consolidate all startups ?
Sure ;-)
Ok, then let me push a bit more: are you ok with merging the C code
from daemon into jk2,
bobh2002/08/28 10:08:58
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StoreBase.java PersistentManagerBase.java
Log:
Currently when backup's of sessions expire they take out the session in RAM
along with them. This patch fixes this problem.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7613.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5507.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Trollinger wrote:
Consider Apache running on port 80, forwarding
luehe 2002/08/28 10:57:13
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
Fixed 11829 (Unable to use Property editors with jsp:attribute)
Revision ChangesPath
1.82 +11 -10
De: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 15:27
Para: Tomcat Dev List
Asunto: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
of load balancers and firewalls, so it is unrealistic to expect to
return port numbers that it doesn't know about. What do you think?
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.tomcat.devel
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
John Trollinger wrote:
I can agree that mod_jk can be seen as part of
amyroh 2002/08/28 11:35:35
Modified:webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/compressionFilters
CompressionServletResponseWrapper.java
Log:
Add support other content-types. Fixes bug 11910. Patch submitted by
Peter Rajsky [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11910.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12135.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
If you run Tomcat behind Apache using JK, the entire combination is the
container from the perspective of the servlet specification. The entire
combination has to meet all the spec rules or it's not compliant.
The fact that the servlet spec
luehe 2002/08/28 13:47:57
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch Generator.java
Log:
Applied change that I had overlooked when backporting fix from Tomcat 5
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
Remy,
I'm testing 4.1.10-dev before tagging, and I ran into some serious problems.
Jasper 2 seems broken (in the TC 4 branch; the HEAD/TC 5 branch may be
broken as well, but I didn't have time to test it), and fails to compile
most pages from the admin webapp.
my apologies! When
Ryan Lubke wrote:
The port MUST be the one in the Host Header if one is present,and should
be present if the request is HTTP1.1 compliant,
What if the Host header is supplied, but the value is empty. This seems
legal per section 14.23 of the HTTP/1.1 RFC?
It is legal in the case that
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
De: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 15:27
Para: Tomcat Dev List
Asunto: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
of load balancers and firewalls, so it is unrealistic to expect to
return port numbers that it doesn't know about. What
De: Ryan Lubke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 20:29
Para: Tomcat Developers List
Asunto: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
The port MUST be the one in the Host Header if one is
present,and should
be present if the request is HTTP1.1 compliant,
What
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12141.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lubke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tcdev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:43 AM
Subject: [Fwd: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors]
By the way the quote was pulled from section 14.23 of RFC 2616.
=
Hi,
bobh2002/08/28 14:53:03
Added: .gump3.xml
Log:
- similar to gump2.xml, but this uses the cvs HEAD to build jasper (for TC5)
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/gump3.xml
Index: gump3.xml
Hi,
I think we can't use the Manager application thro' Apache's mod_webapp
mechanism...
Ref:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg29630.html
Point #4
I have configured a single Apache server and 4 tomcat ( Webapp connector
+ http connectors only). All the 4 instances of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12142.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:05, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
De: Ryan Lubke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 28 de agosto de 2002 20:29
Para: Tomcat Developers List
Asunto: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
The port MUST be the one in the Host Header if one is
present,and
kinman 2002/08/28 16:00:19
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java
Generator.java JspDocumentParser.java PageInfo.java
Parser.java ParserController.java
TagFileProcessor.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11485.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:32, Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lubke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tcdev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:43 AM
Subject: [Fwd: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors]
By the way the quote was pulled from section
On 28 Aug 2002, Ryan Lubke wrote:
1) For me after ( another ) reading of rfc2616, from the point you named
and following the references given there, i've found that in 5.2 seems
to say that a empty Host: header must be responded by 400 because empty
it is not a valid Host name..
But
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 02:14, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Consider Apache running on port 80, forwarding to Tomcat on 8009 (the
default setup). I think it's reasonable for the application developer to
assume that getServerPort() is going to return 80 and not 8009, because
they should
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12046.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 04:28, Bill Barker wrote:
The question in 12052 is whether Apache should use the socket port (as it
does now), or the port in the Host header. When this came up with the
Coyote/Http11 connector, the decision was that the Host header was the
correct one. I'd have to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12145.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12145.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I think the decision to use the Host header is right, but
I agree that it violates the wording in the servlet spec.
The SERVER_PORT and the port in the Host: header are different
beasts - in most use cases I've seen the user is interested
in the second.
Note that a load balancer or proxy is
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet
JspServletWrapper.java
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 28 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lubke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: HTTP Host Request header and TC Connectors]
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:32, Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
I think the decision to use the Host header is right, but
I agree that it violates the wording in the servlet
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12147.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
My understanding is that this is really a client issue, rather than server. By
the time a connector gets it, it's too late to do much about it.
A little bit of research indicates that the user agents I have about will put
the IP address in the Host header if the URI is specified by IP. That
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12101.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12101.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Quoting Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not anymore. ;-) In the current 2.4 spec draft it is required to be taken
from the Host header.
Huh, I guess that's that then. The bug does seem to be valid. At least according
to the newer spec.
Bojan
-
Hi
I am facing strange problem at one of my customers side.
I am using tomcat 3.3 for my devlopment and its working fine.
But at one of customers side tomcat crases unknowingly. It even does not
compile a simple jsp. The os at the client side is solaris,
WHen tomcat starts and a simple
Hi,
%
response.sendRedirect(b.jsp);
String left_page=c.jsp;
%
jsp:include page=%=left_page% flush=true /
Running on Tomcat 4, it is ok. Running on Tomcat 3.3,
the result is correct but there is error message on
console. Of course, the include in this example is
meaningless, but this jsp is
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Bill Barker wrote:
I think the decision to use the Host header is right, but
I agree that it violates the wording in the servlet spec.
The SERVER_PORT and the port in the Host: header are different
beasts - in most use cases I've seen the user is interested
in
94 matches
Mail list logo
