Title: RE: pdf automatic opening problem
Whatis the way to disable mod_deflate for various Content-Type
?
SetEnvIf NoCase in my case don't work for Request_URI because all uri are
from servlet URI, and i need to disable mod_deflate for application/pdf
content-type and image like tif, cgm
Hi All,
I've been trying to test jk2 as we have a little buglet with 2.0.2 (it
appears apache children get confused, and hang whilst/after dealing with jk2
served content, they then hand around and clog up the process list, and
eventually we hit MaxClients).
Due to many reasons we run an older
Jess Holle wrote:
*Feb 17, 2004 5:01:39 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest
decodeRequest
WARNING: Error registering request*
For some reason, the request isn't registered in JMX (which is used
for). It wasn't registered either in previous builds, so I suppose it's
not a big change
EBRARD Loic wrote:
What is the way to disable mod_deflate for various Content-Type ?
SetEnvIf NoCase in my case don't work for Request_URI because all uri
are from servlet URI, and i need to disable mod_deflate for
application/pdf content-type and image like tif, cgm and so on...
any idea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I've been trying to test jk2 as we have a little buglet with 2.0.2 (it
appears apache children get confused, and hang whilst/after dealing with jk2
served content, they then hand around and clog up the process list, and
eventually we hit MaxClients).
Due to many
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[X] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
This build seems ok overall. (I'll move it for mirrorring)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
I am currently researching a way to implement web-container-like
functionality within a J2EE compliant webapp, that can run on
theoretically any servlet container.
One way to do this, would be to embed parts of tomcat such that a number
of self-managed web applications could be served
hi,
is there any benchmark package that you use to test the
performance of
tomcat across versions. like how do you test that tomcat 5 is faster
than tomcat 4 and by how much?
thanks,
nishant
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27030.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Title: AddOutputFilterByType
continuous of problem of disabling mod_deflate for various content-type with mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll,
I try another way wich is to enable mod_deflate for various content-type : text/*
the configuration of mod_deflate used is :
- AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27033.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
EBRARD Loic wrote:
continuous of problem of disabling mod_deflate for various content-type
with mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll,
I try another way wich is to enable mod_deflate for various content-type
: text/*
the configuration of mod_deflate used is :
- AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/*
THE
Title: RE: AddOutputFilterByType
it works fine for you, you have chance ;)
what is the sentences you put in httpd.conf ?
these one ? AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/*
these one ? SetOutputFilter DEFLATE
both of them ?
other one ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I've been trying to test jk2 as we have a little buglet with 2.0.2 (it
appears apache children get confused, and hang whilst/after dealing
with jk2
served content, they then hand around and clog up the process list, and
eventually we hit
EBRARD Loic wrote:
it works fine for you, you have chance ;)
what is the sentences you put in httpd.conf ?
these one ? AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/*
these one ? SetOutputFilter DEFLATE
both of them ?
other one ?
Did have detail here but I remember the :
AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE
Hi Remy,
two things I found (which are probably older bugs, seen them with
5.0.18 too):
- if I call snoop.jsp directly through Tomcat I get 'Content length:
-1' while through mod_jk2 I get 'Content length: 0'
Both are acceptable, but -1 is more accurate.
ok.
- redirection to the welcome
Guenter Knauf wrote:
This is as intended, and is indeed a change in behavior. I
understand it could cause trouble for some applications, but is a
lot cleaner and more efficient.
but it prevents to move applications from TC4 to TC5 since they dont
work out-of-the-box as before, f.e. *.war. isnt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27043.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27043.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It looked like it should work, but I couldn't free up a machine to test it
on (until now :). You can get rid of the messages by adding:
request.registerRequests=false
to your jk2.properties file.
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List
Bill Barker wrote:
It looked like it should work, but I couldn't free up a machine to test it
on (until now :). You can get rid of the messages by adding:
request.registerRequests=false
to your jk2.properties file.
Thanks.
What are the other effects of taking this action (and not taking
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
just found another small issue (seen on Linux and Win32) - the link
on the Tomcat main page to webdav now produces a directory listing
rather than call index.html
This is normal as well.
I noticed it this morning, as well (on Solaris 8 and 9). Just
- Original Message -
From: Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [5.0.19] Release vote
Bill Barker wrote:
It looked like it should work, but I couldn't free up a machine to test
it
on (until
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27048.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27048.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2004/02/18 13:22:22
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper
EmbeddedServletOptions.java JspC.java Options.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources
kinman 2004/02/18 13:24:45
Modified:catalina/src/conf web.xml
Log:
- Document the new Jasper switch errorOnUseBeanInvalidClassAttribute
Revision ChangesPath
1.35 +5 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/conf/web.xml
Index: web.xml
kinman 2004/02/18 13:30:54
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- Remove Sun copyright.
Revision ChangesPath
1.220 +3 -8
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26452.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26452.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27033.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27030.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27030.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26452.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26452.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2004/02/18 14:42:22
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse
JSSESocketFactory.java
Log:
Fixed Bugzilla 27050 (keystoreFile parameter, when specified as
relative, is not treated relative to $CATALINA_BASE or catalina.base
property)
The change was as a result of bug 22108.
The example web app was trying to do two things:
- be an 'normal' web app with an index page
- be an example of a working webdav directory
Essentially, there isn't a configuration for servlet mapping that enables both
of the above to work reliably
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14722.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17741.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've had a decent inital look at the source for Tomcat 5.0 to see if I could
quickly answer this myself but I thought since I haven't quite figured it
out yet, I'd ask the experts.
I have an application that wants to handle the socket (or higher level
objects: req, resp) using it's own thread
- Original Message -
From: Erik Earle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:40 PM
Subject: Disconnecting Socket from the handling thread
I've had a decent inital look at the source for Tomcat 5.0 to see if I
could
quickly answer this myself but I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27056.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27056.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27056.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26507.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2004/02/18 19:44:00
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common HandlerRequest.java
Log:
Fix JMX Request registration.
And, yes I did test it this time :).
Reported By: Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +1 -1
billbarker2004/02/18 21:48:18
Removed: src/native/mod_jk OBSOLETE.txt README
src/native/mod_jk/apache1.3 Makefile.freebsd Makefile.linux
Makefile.nw README.hpux README.solaris
build-hpux-cc.sh build-hpux.sh build-solaris.sh
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27059.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27060.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27060.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
52 matches
Mail list logo