hgomez 2004/03/01 00:35:37
Added: jk/native2/server/apache2 bldjk2.qclsrc
Log:
Initial build file for iSeries (not tested yet)
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/bldjk2.qclsrc
Index: bldjk2.qclsrc
Al Banard wrote:
I tried the latest CVS (using --with-apxs2) on the 25th Feb and got
exactly the same error, unless things have changed with regard to this
between now and then.
Could you send the output of the make command and the jkjni.la file?
I have something like:
+++
/bin/sh
hgomez 2004/03/01 01:20:17
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_status.c
Log:
Make sure we send non-caching headers.
Provided by Guenter Knauf
Revision ChangesPath
1.52 +6 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_status.c
Index:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch to put non-caching headers out; maybe an 'Expires' header is also
needed..?
--- jk_worker_status.c.orig Fri Feb 27 12:24:12 2004
+++ jk_worker_status.c Sun Feb 29 19:30:24 2004
@@ -944,6 +944,10 @@
s-headers_out-put(env, s-headers_out,
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/doc readme-3.3.2 index.html
serverxml.html
billbarker2004/02/29 16:32:18
Modified:src/doc index.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hgomez 2004/03/01 01:34:37
Modified:jk/native2 CHANGES.txt
Log:
Tab policies
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +8 -8 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/CHANGES.txt
Index: CHANGES.txt
===
RCS
hgomez 2004/03/01 01:35:26
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c
Log:
Tab policies
Revision ChangesPath
1.61 +38 -38jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_ajp13.c
Index: jk_worker_ajp13.c
hgomez 2004/03/01 01:38:20
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_status.c
Log:
Tab policies
Revision ChangesPath
1.53 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_status.c
Index: jk_worker_status.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri and others,
What are the remaining issues to be solved?
How about inproc JNI?
I'd like to disable that for all multi process mpm's, meaning almost
everything except winnt.
(It doesnt't work or ever will).
What is the status of shm?
Again, it's useless for all single mpm's.
How about to
Mladen Turk wrote:
Henri and others,
What are the remaining issues to be solved?
How about inproc JNI?
I'd like to disable that for all multi process mpm's, meaning almost
everything except winnt.
(It doesnt't work or ever will).
Multi process MPM ? you means multi-threaded and prefork models ?
hgomez 2004/03/01 03:21:03
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c
Log:
Add more informations on port we're using...
Revision ChangesPath
1.53 +5 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c
Index: jk_ajp_common.c
Seems there is something wrong here, 3 params awaited but only
2 params provided:
if (remote_sa-next) {
env-l-jkLog(env, env-l, JK_LOG_DEBUG,
channelApr.open(): error %d creating
socket %d %s\n,
ret,
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
How about inproc JNI?
I'd like to disable that for all multi process mpm's,
meaning almost
everything except winnt.
(It doesnt't work or ever will).
Multi process MPM ? you means multi-threaded and prefork models ?
Yes, the ones
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
How about inproc JNI?
I'd like to disable that for all multi process mpm's,
meaning almost
everything except winnt.
(It doesnt't work or ever will).
Multi process MPM ? you means multi-threaded and prefork models ?
Yes, the
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Yes, the ones that create multiple child processes.
Each child in that case wishes to run it's own Tomcat process, with
the same config.
The consecutive TC instance fails to load (same config, same ports).
Correct indeed, how could
In jk there is many areas where we need to add informations about
the remote tomcat IP adress and we only a sockaddr_in struct available.
Question:
There is the inet_ntoa function but I wonder how it works with
multi-threaded apps on OS like Windows, Netware, ...
Regards.
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Yes, the ones that create multiple child processes.
Each child in that case wishes to run it's own Tomcat process, with
the same config.
The consecutive TC instance fails to load (same config, same ports).
Correct indeed, how
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27330.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry, bad assumption on my part. I was looking out for
the 4.1.30 tag in jakarta-tomcat-4.0 and didn't realize
that jakarta-tomcat-connectors had been tagged the day
before.
Since a 4.1.31 isn't likely, I'll prepare a patch to correct
this for 4.1.30.
Cheers,
Larry
-Original Message-
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Sorry, bad assumption on my part. I was looking out for
the 4.1.30 tag in jakarta-tomcat-4.0 and didn't realize
that jakarta-tomcat-connectors had been tagged the day
before.
Since a 4.1.31 isn't likely, I'll prepare a patch to correct
this for 4.1.30.
I have nothing against
hgomez 2004/03/01 05:37:38
Modified:jk/native/common jk_connect.h jk_ajp_common.c jk_connect.c
Log:
Dump informations about remote tomcat in form : A.B.C.D:PORT
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +4 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_connect.h
Index:
hgomez 2004/03/01 05:47:23
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c
Log:
More debug/trace infos on remote tomcats
Revision ChangesPath
1.55 +13 -11jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c
Index: jk_ajp_common.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27336.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hgomez 2004/03/01 06:05:54
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_apr_socket.c
Log:
We have less arguments than wanted in strings (varargs)
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +2 -2
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_channel_apr_socket.c
Index:
Howdy,
Just checked my recent echoed patches and while OE6 shows a paperclip
symbol against them, the attachments (if still present) are not
accessible.
That's because OE6 will strip potentially dangerous attachements (=
nearly anything).
since you are the list moderator, maybe you can also
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 8:26 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: allowTrace attribute causing problemsin the
adminapplication
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Sorry, bad assumption on my part. I was looking
hgomez 2004/03/01 05:51:48
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c
Log:
Ups
Revision ChangesPath
1.56 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c
Index: jk_ajp_common.c
yoavs 2004/03/01 06:01:28
Modified:webapps/docs introduction.xml
Log:
Removed reference to $CATALINA_HOME/README.txt as I can't seem to find
it in CVS or in distro.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -4 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/introduction.xml
Hi,
While we're at the subject of fixing broken links, the README.txt link
on Tomcat 5's introduction page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/introduction.html
is still broken --
(http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/README.txt)
I've fixed this in CVS and the site
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hgomez 2004/03/01 05:47:23
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c
Log:
More debug/trace infos on remote tomcats
I added more infos on IP/PORT of remote tomcats in jk, since I've some
reports that there is a problem for admins to determine which tomcat
Hi,
I'll reimplement the jk2_shm using apr_rmm.
The code itself will be significantly simpler.
1. The shared memory will not be present if ap_exists_scoreboard_image
retunes zero.
2. The shared memory will be present if above is satisfied using the
ap_scoreboard_fname + _jk2 if our shm
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I'll reimplement the jk2_shm using apr_rmm.
The code itself will be significantly simpler.
1. The shared memory will not be present if ap_exists_scoreboard_image
retunes zero.
2. The shared memory will be present if above is satisfied using the
ap_scoreboard_fname +
Tried posting this question to users but it seems over that list's head
because of the lack of answer there.
I have a cluster of 5 apache-tomcat pairs. I set a lb_factor for the
local tomcat to 100 and the lb_factor for the other 4 tomcat's to 1.
When I look at the jkstatus I see this result:
Hi Yoav,
That's because OE6 will strip potentially dangerous attachements (=
nearly anything).
I dont use OE, so that's not the problem for me.
Basically, no ;) I can't look into it, as the policy regarding
attachements is ASF-general. The tomcat lists are no different from all
other ASF
footer.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Angus Mezick
Why the heck to the workers with a lb_factor of 1 get a
lb_value of 19[1-2]? What is lb_value? I am expecting for
ever 104 requests worker
3 will get 100 of them and workers 2,4,5,6 will get 1 each.
Am I wrong?
default lb_factor is 1,
Howdy,
Basically, no ;) I can't look into it, as the policy regarding
attachements is ASF-general. The tomcat lists are no different from
all
other ASF lists, I couldn't make them different even if I tried.
That's not true:
- I'm suscribed to apr and httpd-dev lists, and there attachments
yoavs 2004/03/01 07:35:03
Modified:webapps/docs index.xml
Log:
Fixed link to JK2 Documentation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/index.xml
Index: index.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I bed that the issue is gone if you remove the footer.
That's not in my power to try: contact the general apache mail
administrator with your concerns and suggestions for this issue.
ok, thanks.
No, read what I said carefully. You can discuss things all you want
here, and it's the right
yoavs 2004/03/01 07:45:52
Modified:webapps/docs/appdev processes.xml source.xml
Log:
Added some links to the servlet specification per user requests.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +4 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/appdev/processes.xml
Index:
remm2004/03/01 08:00:53
Modified:catalina/src/bin tool-wrapper.bat tool-wrapper.sh
Log:
- Bug 27336: Add JMX to the classpath for some tools.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/tool-wrapper.bat
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27336.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 February 2004 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jk2 buglets
hmm, you could check to use the old mmap code which Henri
just has checked in again; get latest jk_shm.c from cvs and
modifiy it to
Thanks Guenter. I'm actually acutely aware of that, being the person
responsible for configuring and installing Tomcat on NetWare 6.5.
I had it in my example steps below, since that is exactly what appears
on a clean install right from the tarball or zip file.
THe problem turned out to be a CVS
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I have setup Tomcat to work with IIS. for SSL requests, since IIS decrypts
the request and passes it unencrypted to Tomcat, How do I encrypt the
request so that all communication from IIS with Tomcat is secure - round
trip encryption???
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27330.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assuming that the next mod_jk2 release wants to go with the
present APR
(0.94) or even the CVS (pre 1.0?) then we need to kludge
mod_jk on solaris 8 (at least) to not use APR for this bit.
No it's gonna be 0.95 (the one distributed
Hi,
Look at my today post (JK2 shm).
It's going to use the shm.
If the platform is missing APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY the shm will be disabled.
Also you can alway set the shm to disabled if the APR platform MMAP is
buggy.
but what will we all loose if then the scoreboard isnt active??
Guenter.
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf
Look at my today post (JK2 shm).
It's going to use the shm.
If the platform is missing APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY the shm
will be disabled.
Also you can alway set the shm to disabled if the APR
platform MMAP is
buggy.
but what will
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13588.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2004/03/01 13:09:21
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- Fix bugzilla 27330: pageContext not defined in the body of nest tags.
Revision ChangesPath
1.221 +6 -3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27330.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
In my apache 2.0.48 install the version of apr is 0.95.
Glenn
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:04:17PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 February 2004 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jk2 buglets
Hi Mladen,
but what will we all loose if then the scoreboard isnt active??
In case of single child mpm, nothing.
On others, jkstatus at least.
so the scoreboard is only for collecting stats?
Also, we adopted the APR as mandatory, so, all platform specific code
except JNI has to go out
fhanik 2004/03/01 13:35:34
Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session
DeltaManager.java
Log:
the new and valid flags have to be set before the creation listeners are invoked
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +4 -4
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26978.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hey folks, I've just noticed something interesting...
The 2.3 HttpServletRequest interface provides a setAttribute() method to
change the values of a given attribute. It does NOT however provide a
similar setParameter() method, allowing you to programatically modify the
values that accompany the
fhanik 2004/03/01 13:58:49
Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp
SocketSender.java
Log:
added in the server ip and port for debug purposes when logging a ACK timeout
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +1 -1
reply
attachment: mail2.zip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kinman 2004/03/01 14:51:34
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Node.java
Log:
- Fix 27338: Wrong Smap line for CDATA in scriptlets in .jspx pages.
Revision ChangesPath
1.79 +15 -3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25373.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Randy Watler wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Randy Watler wrote:
I am currently experimenting with the Java 1.5 remote JMX/MBeans for
use in our build process.
...
Can anyone clarify how the createStandardContext should be invoked?
You can look at the JBoss integration code for examples.
...
Hi Christian,
The 2.3 HttpServletRequest interface provides a setAttribute() method to
change the values of a given attribute. It does NOT however provide a
similar setParameter() method, allowing you to programatically modify the
values that accompany the request - I assume this means that we
luehe 2004/03/01 16:35:46
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteRequestFacade.java
Log:
Clone arrays returned by getParameterValues() and getCookies()
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +22 -6
luehe 2004/03/01 17:17:39
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Protocol.java
Log:
Fixed indentation
Revision ChangesPath
1.53 +19 -23
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Protocol.java
Index:
Thank you for contacting Corel Customer Support Services.
In order to better serve the needs of our customers we have updated our
e-mail response system and knowledge base.
Please re-submit your question using the following link and we will
respond to your inquiry within
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf
but what will we all loose if then the scoreboard isnt active??
In case of single child mpm, nothing.
On others, jkstatus at least.
so the scoreboard is only for collecting stats?
And for load balancing stats.
Also, we adopted
78 matches
Mail list logo
