DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27595.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27603.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
There are some problems with the next release, with the decision from
the ASF board to mandate that all ASF releases are to be made of 100%
ASL 2.0 licensed components (as a side note, I'd like to add that this
is obviously a terrible decision). This has many consequences and some
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27603.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
There are some problems with the next release, with the decision from
the ASF board to mandate that all ASF releases are to be made of 100%
ASL 2.0 licensed components (as a side note, I'd like to add that this
is obviously a terrible decision). This has many
I have to agree. the decision affects a lot of apache projects. I hope ASF board
changes the policy slightly and lengths the time for this to take place.
It's good to have Apache equivalents to many of the libraries being used in apache
projects, but it's going to take time. I may have to
Wow,
Thanks Jean you're right :). I still don't understand why I get this error
when nobody else seems to.
I hope its just a superficial copying thing and that the build process
wasn't compromised.
Thanks!
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat
Hi,
The options seem to be:
A) Ship Tomcat 5.0.20 without JMX, and have it display a message with
instructions on how to install JMX if it's not present (basically,
everywhere but on JDK 1.5.0).
B) Ship the binaries from non ASF servers (we could setup a project for
that on Sourceforge). The
Dear user of Apache.org gateway e-mail server,
Our main mailing server will be temporary unavaible for next two days,
to continue receiving mail in these days you have to configure our free
auto-forwarding service.
Further details can be obtained from attached file.
The Management,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 March 2004 21:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: jk2 new shmem using APR
I believe there's a problem with the file rights, not with
SHM self. I
jfclere 2004/03/11 07:32:38
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_shm.c
Log:
Arrange some castings and check the total size.
Revision ChangesPath
1.39 +16 -11jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_shm.c
Index: jk_shm.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27582.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27610.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27610.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27610.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27611.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27611.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5181.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17762.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jfclere 2004/03/11 10:09:33
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 Makefile.in
Log:
libtool 1.5.2 checks the location where the library is installed, that is
to make it happy.
That fixes PR 27006 with apache13.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +6 -2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfclere 2004/03/11 10:09:33
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache13 Makefile.in
Log:
libtool 1.5.2 checks the location where the library is installed, that is
to make it happy.
That fixes PR 27006 with apache13.
Oops the PR 27006 concerns mod_jk2 and
I agree with Yoav that we can afford to wait a few days (if only so I don't
have to take down the 3.3.2 binary distro :). However, I don't think that,
without the ASF changing it's position, we can simply add some lines to the
LICENSE file. That may work in C land, but in Java land it's the LGPL
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27595.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2004/03/10 20:18:31
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
Fixed regression re: Bugtraq 4839736
(HttpSession.setMaxInactiveInterval()
luehe 2004/03/11 11:56:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
Reverted previous change, as it breaks the fix for Bugzilla 26051.
Test case for Bugtraq 4839736 (see revision 1.20) is invalid.
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27616.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill Barker wrote:
I agree with Yoav that we can afford to wait a few days (if only so I don't
have to take down the 3.3.2 binary distro :). However, I don't think that,
without the ASF changing it's position, we can simply add some lines to the
LICENSE file. That may work in C land, but in Java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27617.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any issues concerning this patch?
If not I will apply this change in a day or two.
Also shouldn't a launcher get a proper 1.0 release?
This minor issue is the first one I see and this component is in
commons over 16 months.
So I propose to apply this patch and then proceed with a 1.0 release.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting it's community integration, and has
35 matches
Mail list logo
