[GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/tomcat-catalina failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-catalina has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28839] - The Coyote connector publishes empty URIs to catalina

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28839] - The Coyote connector publishes empty URIs to catalina

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29108] New: - "chunked" transfer-encoding is not working

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29107] New: - Redeploy existing application using URL will remove the application

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

jean-frederic clere wrote: I am building a rpm of Tomcat for one of FSC product (OpenIS). It installs Tomcat in /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-${VERSION} and /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat or /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat5. It uses jsvc (for common-daemon) to start/stop the Tomcat. I was planning to "b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29094] - Webdav servlet failure in 5.0.24 with IE5 and IE6 clients

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29105] New: - Tomcat + AJP Response Header Encoding Problem

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29100] New: - jsp2-example-taglib has invalid schemaLocation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: tabindex question?

Try: 1. Asking an understandable question. 2. Asking on the right list. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html > From: bensifuentes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:50 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: tabindex question? > > I really need to know if th

Harald Buitmann ist ausser Haus. [Virus checked Plusbank]

Ich werde ab 19.05.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 24.05.2004. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Kollegen im Personalmanagement. Diese Nachricht kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, so bitten wir um eine kurz

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28943] - Wrong command (cd CURRENT_DIR) in startup.bat and catalina.bat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29087] - variables/attributes declared in tag files are not visible to fragments passed in

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Harald Buitmann ist ausser Haus. [Virus checked Plusbank]

Ich werde ab 19.05.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 24.05.2004. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Kollegen im Personalmanagement. Diese Nachricht kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, so bitten wir um eine kurz

Harald Buitmann ist ausser Haus. [Virus checked Plusbank]

Ich werde ab 19.05.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 24.05.2004. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Kollegen im Personalmanagement. Diese Nachricht kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, so bitten wir um eine kurz

Harald Buitmann ist ausser Haus. [Virus checked Plusbank]

Ich werde ab 19.05.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 24.05.2004. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Kollegen im Personalmanagement. Diese Nachricht kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, so bitten wir um eine kurz

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29096] New: - service.bat Does Not Accept Dash in Service Name

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

then by all means, get rid of it. Cause now we are only removing it from new releases of TC 5 and not TC4 Filip - Original Message - From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:01 PM Subject: RE: HTTP 1.1 Conn

RE: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

Hi, I should have been clearer: I was thinking of the active, non-maintenance branches only. This would not affect 3.x and 4.x ideally. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-Original Message- >From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:59 PM

Re: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

It's been gone from j-t-catalina for quite awhile now, so this would be a change to TC 4.1.x. Personally I think that removing this would be too big of a change for a maintenance branch. However, I haven't been active on the 4.1 branch for a very long time, so I'll leave the decision up to those

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

yoavs 2004/05/19 09:54:22 Modified:.build.properties.default Log: - Updated JUnit dependency to 3.8.1 (latest stable JUnit) - Did a clean build, test, release cycle without a problem. Revision ChangesPath 1.123 +5 -5 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.

Re: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

On Wed, 19 May 2004, Filip Hanik - Dev wrote: | keep it in, Remove it. - it's garbage. The smaller the codebase is, the better. Always. 10kB down is 10kB -better-! | | Like my great grand father said, "If it aint broke, don't fix it" :) | - Original Message - | From: "Shapira, Yoav" <

RE: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

Hi, Why keep it in if no one is using it, though? It's additional code in our repository, it's been deprecated for a while, we could speed up the build, reduce documentation, and reduce confusion (there are already enough connector questions) by removing it. If there's evidence many people are u

Harald Buitmann ist ausser Haus. [Virus checked Plusbank]

Ich werde ab 19.05.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 24.05.2004. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Kollegen im Personalmanagement. Diese Nachricht kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, so bitten wir um eine kurz

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

Costin Manolache wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: It seem we had one - but was removed 4 years ago, when Henri started it's RPMs ( if I remember corectly ). http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/Attic/tomcat.spec?rev=1.3&view=markup If I update it for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29094] New: - Webdav servlet failure in 5.0.24 with IE5 and IE6 clients

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

keep it in, Like my great grand father said, "If it aint broke, don't fix it" :) - Original Message - From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:34 AM Subject: RE: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye? Hi, >IMHO Q

RE: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

Hi, >IMHO Quite a few people seem to still use it. I'd be inclined to remove it I don't mind keeping it in (it's zero effort to keep it in, nonzero effort to remove it), but I'd like evidence that people are using it. Do you have any recent posts or something to that effect? Yoav Shapira Thi

RE: HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

Hi, IMHO Quite a few people seem to still use it. I'd be inclined to remove it from future distributions but keep it up on the web somewhere, along with its documentation, and put a note on the connectors documentation saying "its deprecated but if you insist on using it follow this link". If it

HTTP 1.1 Connector - Bye bye?

Hi, Should we bid adieu to the HTTP11 connector (the old, non-Coyote one) at some point in the near future? It's been deprecated for a while, and given the default settings (Coyote) and active discouragement from using HTTP11 to user, I think it's safe to assume it's not being widely used. We can

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29093] New: - When reloading context IllegalStateException is not catched

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29091] New: - Non-ascii characters are not handled correctly...

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29089] - Tomcat hangs socket write error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29089] New: - Tomcat hangs socket write error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

jean-frederic clere wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: It seem we had one - but was removed 4 years ago, when Henri started it's RPMs ( if I remember corectly ). http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/Attic/tomcat.spec?rev=1.3&view=markup If I update it for 4.x and 5.0 - and manag

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29087] New: - variables/attributes declared in tag files are not visible to fragments passed in

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: tabindex question?

I really need to know if ths is possable? Could one of the Tomcat gurus please take the time to give me an answer for this? Any help would be appreciated. -Ben - Original Message - From: "bensifuentes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:38 PM Subj

RE: Next release

Hi, >IMHO, 1.5 would be the right way to go. For me mostly for performance, >and cleaner code reasons (generics, auto-boxing, enums, etc.). Please do NOT automatically equate JDK 1.5 with cleaner code. Cleanliness is obviously subjective. If you think auto-boxing is a good performance thing, yo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28559] - mod_jk2 2.0.4 compiler error on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3.0, Apache 2.0.46

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28790] - "connection reset by peer" and "ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error 3"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28790] - "connection reset by peer" and "ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error 3"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28559] - mod_jk2 2.0.4 compiler error on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3.0, Apache 2.0.46

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AW: Byte-Range-Serving of DefaultServlet and Acrobat 6

Thanks for committing the changes to DefaultServlet. So the only problem left is the missing "Accept-Ranges: bytes" header. The spec says that the server MAY send this header, but at least Acrobat needs it. I know how to use a filter. In fact this way I tested this here. BTW, for us the PDF cap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22388] - TC 5.0.7 Startup Exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29056] - java.util.ConcurrentModificationException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: RPM spec file using our layout

Costin Manolache wrote: It seem we had one - but was removed 4 years ago, when Henri started it's RPMs ( if I remember corectly ). http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/etc/Attic/tomcat.spec?rev=1.3&view=markup If I update it for 4.x and 5.0 - and manage to get it working on wind