Hello,
used following plugins:
Lomboz Plugin
download:
http://forge.objectweb.org/project/showfiles.php?group_id=97
info
http://www.objectlearn.com/projects/lomboz.jsp
or search to the eclipse plugin pages:
http://www.eclipse-plugins.info/eclipse/plugins.jsp?category=Tomcat
or programming help
Hi peter,
What I actually meant by Tomcat Project, was't a tomcat webapps project,
But Project from tomcat Source code.
Please treat it accordingly.
Regards,
Jagsir
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rossbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:58 AM
To: Tomcat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28469.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28469.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28469.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Yeah, go ahead with the refactoring. I'll tag 5.0.26 tonight (on HEAD of course)
unless I hear some last-minute things on this list during the day today.
I'm going to open a separate thread on CVS branching, I need a bit of clarification in
that area.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research
Hi,
So at some point soon (the next day or two), we want to put the current
tomcat 5 code on a branch called tomcat_5_0 (the actual branch name is
tentative but let's use tomcat_5_0 for example). We'll do this after
tagging TOMCAT_5_0_26 on the main branch.
The actual CVS command is easy:
cvs
yoavs 2004/06/01 06:13:19
Modified:docs/faq misc.html
docs/faq/printer misc.html
xdocs-faq misc.xml
Log:
Added logging configuration link.
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/faq/misc.html
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29174.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28234.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi, Yeah, go ahead with the refactoring. I'll tag 5.0.26 tonight (on
HEAD of course) unless I hear some last-minute things on this list
during the day today.
I'm going to open a separate thread on CVS branching, I need a bit of
clarification in that area.
I need to tweak a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26890.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
We need to do a new release, 5.0.26, because of
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29255. Does anyone
have stuff they're working on, and would therefore like me to wait a
couple of days (or more, or less?) before tagging and building?
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik (lists) wrote:
BTW, is it ok if I start my refatoring(s) in a separate branch based on
go ahead, refator. :-)
I'll refator then.
I'll redo logging as well, and define c-l categories (for webapps, for
example) to be able to eventually remove Logger altogether.
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
I think renaming the classes, like they did for Xerces in j2se 1.5,
would be the easiest way. But since we are refactoring, we can also
think of a pluggable SPI were the digester can be plugged, as well as
our own parsing mechanism. That would be usefull when Tomcat
remm2004/06/01 07:34:22
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java InternalInputBuffer.java
Log:
- Bug 29166: Tweak expectation handling so that if the expectation isn't satisfied,
we don't attempt to swallow the request's
remm2004/06/01 08:00:10
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
- Update changelog.
Revision ChangesPath
1.60 +8 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
Dear GateLock user,
GateLock has detected the WORM_NETSKY.D in your email attachment application.pif.
The file could not be cleaned and was therefore deleted.---BeginMessage---
Please read the attached file.
---End Message---
-
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29166.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29324.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29324.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27534.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Since Gump(y) hasn't built for months, it can't complain more than it
already is doing ;-).
The real question is whether we want to run Gump on the 5.0 branch as well
as HEAD.
- Original Message -
From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26783.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
yoavs 2004/06/01 12:22:09
Modified:resources/deployer build.xml
Log:
Added UTF-8 encoding to deployer build:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/deployer/build.xml
Index:
yoavs 2004/06/01 12:22:20
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
Added UTF-8 encoding to deployer build:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940
Revision ChangesPath
1.61 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Quick question,
is there a reason the user code has access to the internal session instead of the
session facade on session events?
event = new HttpSessionBindingEvent(this,name,value); //inside StandardSession
as opposed to this code, which would give the user a facade?
event = new
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote:
Quick question, is there a reason the user code has access to the
internal session instead of the session facade on session events?
event = new HttpSessionBindingEvent(this,name,value); //inside
StandardSession
as opposed to this code, which would give the user a facade?
Hi,
I'd like to get Gump to build. It seems like it's getting the wrong
struts version (1.0.2 instead of 1.1), thereby causing compile errors
for the admin webapp? Anyways, let's not continue that discussion in
this thread.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Looking at http://gump.covalent.net/log/jakarta-tomcat-5.html, I see
Gump failed to build because of admin webapp compilation errors that
appear related to the Struts version used.
What is our process for debugging this? Are we responsible to ensure
the Gump builds succeed? Who owns the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/jakarta-regexp/build/jakarta-regexp-20040601.jar
-Dmail.home=/usr/local/gump/packages/javamail-1.3
-Dant.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist
-Dsite2.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-site2
-Dcommons-collections.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/collections
Yup, it seems that the Struts team has changed things about a year ago so
that the admin doesn't work with it anymore. For debugging this one, it is
probably enough to build Tomcat against a CVS co of struts.
In general, you can co gump to a machine with python installed and debug the
entire
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27222.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Facading is likely worthless for sessions,
you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue?
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: session
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote:
Facading is likely worthless for sessions,
you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue?
Try it by turning the Security Manager on ;-)
-- Jeanfrancois
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote:
Facading is likely worthless for sessions,
you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue?
Missed that one ;)
As Jean-François said, the security manager will avoid the problem. I
think it won't hurt replacing the thiss with getSession()s in the
Het adres [EMAIL PROTECTED] is voorlopig niet meer in gebruik vanwege grote
hoeveelheden virusmails die daarop binnenkomen.
Gebruik het nieuwe adres dat op de website staat (linksonder).
Excuses voor het ongemak!
-
To
ok, I can do this tomorrow.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:09 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: session facade not used for event
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote:
Facading is likely worthless for sessions,
you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
63 matches
Mail list logo