DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33187.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/01/21 00:41:17
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
JAASCallbackHandler.java
Log:
- 33187: Remove any logging of the password. Submitted by Andrew Jaquith.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -6
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33187.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I could say that I'm using some Linux boxes with 2.6.x and latest IBM
SDK 1.4.2 and it rocks, faster than my workstation running XP and Sun
SDK which use a similar hardware (P4 2.8Ghz).
Which Linux distribution/version did you tried ?
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:07:18 -0800 (PST), Leon Gent [EMAIL
+1 for AJP14 :)
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:21:50 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Inside J-T-C we have ajp directory containing
the code that has been moved to Apache2.1 mod_proxy.
I wish to make that code completely independent
of any web server, as well as making a server
Mathias know well TC-DEV, he provide us some LB code in jk 1.2 :)
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:16:56 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mathias Herberts wrote:
Hi,
I've been running Tomcat 3.3 with Apache frontend servers for quite some
time now without any problems. Recently I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
You got a new message.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
+1 for AJP14 :)
Well, I wish that we first write a spec
before doing any coding.
AJP13 extension proposal is a good starting
point, but IMO needs a lot of work to become
AJP14.
For example my wish list is:
1. Multicast support
2. Single and two phase authentication
3. Encryption
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/01/21 05:11:02
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves
ErrorReportValve.java
Log:
- 33033: Don't do anything to the response if data has already been written.
I didn't attempt to really
reproduce the bug report, but the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 4:05 AM
Subject: Re: Reviving AJP codebase
Henri Gomez wrote:
+1 for AJP14 :)
Well, I wish that we first write a spec
before doing any
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 4:05 AM
Subject: Re: Reviving AJP codebase
Henri Gomez wrote:
+1 for AJP14 :)
Well, I wish that we first write a spec
before
Hi,
Other users of the forums I maintain pointed me to the index page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi
where still 1.2.6 is listed as recent connector (the links seems symbolic, but
I've not tested if it points to the recent version or not).
also I was pointed to:
markt 2005/01/21 11:24:13
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config globalresources.xml
Log:
Port improved into text from TC5. Should prevent bugs like 27158.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +11 -3
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/globalresources.xml
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Other users of the forums I maintain pointed me to the index page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi
where still 1.2.6 is listed as recent connector (the links seems symbolic, but I've not tested if it points to the recent version or not).
Yoav can you handle
Hi Mladen,
also I was pointed to:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/changelog.html
where 1.2.7 is listed as most recent...
This is IMO actually OK. The changes are from 1.2.7.
When we'll have 1.2.8 changes they'll be from 1.2.8
h; then the question is what 'Changes from
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi Mladen,
I think that most if not all users expect that there at the top the most
recent version is listed;
perhaps we can change the 'Changes from JK 1.2.7' to 'Changes with JK 1.2.8
release' ??
Sure that makes sense.
and do you agree that I pick up these changes and put
You can get karma for jakarta-site2 (aka j.a.o/site/) just by asking for
it: Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] You should already have karma for
jakarta-tomcat-site (aka j.a.o/tomcat).
- Original Message -
From: Günter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33187.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/01/21 14:49:22
Modified:webapps/docs realm-howto.xml
Log:
- Should be false here.
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/realm-howto.xml
Index: realm-howto.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I would like to see comparisons and benchmarks on the both a Tomcat
standalone and a Apache+Tomcat loadbalancing setup
I do know there are pros and cons to both setups, for example I don't know
how to make TC swalow an SSL acceleration card, but I have never found
actual general metrics
What is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29406.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Your document is attached to this mail.
+++ Attachment: No Virus found
+++ MC-Afee AntiVirus - www.mcafee.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
36 matches
Mail list logo
