Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

2005-04-09 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hey, the problem is arround the keep a live handling code and the auto reconnect at SimpleTcpCluster. One thread can say: I drop the connection and open new one, then start transfer message and wait for ack. Other thread comes and see ups. the connection is not there. ( Arrg missing

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

2005-04-09 Thread Peter Rossbach
Congratulation, too! Peter Yoav Shapira schrieb: Hi, The problem is that clustering only patches in HEAD may pick up incompatible changes, like the Session.getId patch. We also shouldn't do a new 5.5.10 tag based on HEAD, as it would pick up the risky stuff. Maybe one solution would be to do a

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

2005-04-09 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Rossbach wrote: My customers needs the new 5.5.9 Release. The best thing is, we package a separate patch-cluster-fix and mark 5.5.9 as beta. Given the state of HEAD, and given some the 5.5.7 issues, I would like 5.5.9 to be stable. This means we would need a way to fix 5.5.9 without new

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

2005-04-09 Thread Peter Rossbach
I thing the instability is also included at 5.5.7 clustering. Are you certain reverting to 5.5.8 clustering is not possible (meaning that it contains the same problems - or worse - as 5.5.9) ? If so, I think we need to forget about clustering stability for now, and mention that it is

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

2005-04-09 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Rossbach wrote: I thing the instability is also included at 5.5.7 clustering. :( So it's safe to assume all 5.5 builds have some kind of issues with the clustering then, probably due to lack of actual production testing. Are you certain reverting to 5.5.8 clustering is not possible

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/tools/reports tomcat_trend.pl

2005-04-09 Thread glenn
glenn 2005/04/09 08:24:44 Modified:jk/tools/reports tomcat_trend.pl Log: Update to support changes to error logging string format Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/tools/reports/tomcat_trend.pl Index: tomcat_trend.pl

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_lb_worker.c

2005-04-09 Thread glenn
glenn 2005/04/09 08:29:14 Modified:jk/native/common jk_lb_worker.c Log: BUG: 34358 loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled The lbworker-lbmethod was not being intialized from the worker.properties config. Fixed bug based on mladen's recommendation. Revision

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34358] - loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled

2005-04-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34358. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34358] - loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled

2005-04-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34358. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34357] - Seg Fault in Apache 2 mod_jk.c

2005-04-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34357. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

2005-04-09 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Ok, this give me and Filip time for real stability testing and review the 5.5.10 codebase. I also package my fixes to the 5.5.9 codebase for some test user as bug report.. I'll let Yoav decide what he wants to do with all these builds before he gets married (congratulations ;)).

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2005-04-09 Thread glenn
glenn 2005/04/09 08:44:35 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c Log: BUG: 34357 Apache 2 JkAutoAlias segfault In some situations Apache 2 mod_jk could segfault when the JkAutoAlias directive is used. Added an additional null pointer test. Revision Changes

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs changelog.xml

2005-04-09 Thread glenn
glenn 2005/04/09 08:44:58 Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt jk/xdocs changelog.xml Log: Document bug fixes Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +8 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/CHANGES.txt Index: CHANGES.txt

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

2005-04-09 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Ok, this give me and Filip time for real stability testing and review the 5.5.10 codebase. I also package my fixes to the 5.5.9 codebase for some test user as bug report.. I'll let Yoav decide what he wants to do with all these builds before he gets married (congratulations

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

2005-04-09 Thread billbarker
billbarker2005/04/09 12:30:37 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Note SSL change, fix typo. Revision ChangesPath 1.284 +9 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Index: changelog.xml

HELLO

2005-04-09 Thread pier
Here are your banks documents. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Building Question

2005-04-09 Thread Bill Barker
I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However, it's a PITA for 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wasting my time (not many people use the source distro :). This message is intended only for the

RE: Building Question

2005-04-09 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However, it's a PITA for 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wasting my time (not many people use the source distro :). I've been building with 1.4,