Hey,
the problem is arround the keep a live handling code and the auto
reconnect at SimpleTcpCluster.
One thread can say: I drop the connection and open new one, then
start transfer message and wait for ack.
Other thread comes and see ups. the connection is not there. ( Arrg
missing
Congratulation, too!
Peter
Yoav Shapira schrieb:
Hi,
The problem is that clustering only patches in HEAD may pick up
incompatible changes, like the Session.getId patch. We also shouldn't do
a new 5.5.10 tag based on HEAD, as it would pick up the risky stuff.
Maybe one solution would be to do a
Peter Rossbach wrote:
My customers needs the new 5.5.9 Release. The best thing is, we package a
separate patch-cluster-fix and mark 5.5.9 as beta.
Given the state of HEAD, and given some the 5.5.7 issues, I would like
5.5.9 to be stable. This means we would need a way to fix 5.5.9 without
new
I thing the instability is also included at 5.5.7 clustering.
Are you certain reverting to 5.5.8 clustering is not possible
(meaning that it contains the same problems - or worse - as 5.5.9) ? If
so, I think we need to forget about clustering stability for now, and
mention that it is
Peter Rossbach wrote:
I thing the instability is also included at 5.5.7 clustering.
:(
So it's safe to assume all 5.5 builds have some kind of issues with the
clustering then, probably due to lack of actual production testing.
Are you certain reverting to 5.5.8 clustering is not possible
glenn 2005/04/09 08:24:44
Modified:jk/tools/reports tomcat_trend.pl
Log:
Update to support changes to error logging string format
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +4 -4
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/tools/reports/tomcat_trend.pl
Index: tomcat_trend.pl
glenn 2005/04/09 08:29:14
Modified:jk/native/common jk_lb_worker.c
Log:
BUG: 34358 loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled
The lbworker-lbmethod was not being intialized from the
worker.properties config.
Fixed bug based on mladen's recommendation.
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34357.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Ok, this give me and Filip time for real stability testing and review
the 5.5.10 codebase.
I also package my fixes to the 5.5.9 codebase for some test user as bug
report..
I'll let Yoav decide what he wants to do with all these builds before he
gets married (congratulations ;)).
glenn 2005/04/09 08:44:35
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
BUG: 34357 Apache 2 JkAutoAlias segfault
In some situations Apache 2 mod_jk could segfault
when the JkAutoAlias directive is used.
Added an additional null pointer test.
Revision Changes
glenn 2005/04/09 08:44:58
Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt
jk/xdocs changelog.xml
Log:
Document bug fixes
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +8 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/CHANGES.txt
Index: CHANGES.txt
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Ok, this give me and Filip time for real stability testing and review
the 5.5.10 codebase.
I also package my fixes to the 5.5.9 codebase for some test user as bug
report..
I'll let Yoav decide what he wants to do with all these builds before he
gets married (congratulations
billbarker2005/04/09 12:30:37
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
Note SSL change, fix typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.284 +9 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
Here are your banks documents.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However, it's
a PITA for 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are
being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wasting my time (not many people
use the source distro :).
This message is intended only for the
Hi,
I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However,
it's
a PITA for 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are
being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wasting my time (not many
people
use the source distro :).
I've been building with 1.4,
18 matches
Mail list logo