Exception with 4.1.15

2002-11-19 Thread David Oxley
I have just tried our app with 4.1.15 and get the following exception. Is this already known about or do you need more info. It works fine with 4.1.12. 19-Nov-2002 10:52:54 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket processConnection SEVERE: Error, closing connection java.net.SocketTimeoutException:

Tomcat as a service

2002-10-04 Thread David Oxley
I have Tomcat 4.1.10 installed as a service on Windows and have changed the JVM options by editing the registry. I wanted to use the new GC options available in JDK 1.4.1. See the attached reg file. This works fine half the time, but gives a GPF the rest of the time. This may be a bug with

RE: [4.1.10] Stability rating

2002-09-04 Thread David Oxley
Remy, If people vote for stable will it be released as an 'rc' for a week or so before being declared stable? Dave. -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 09:59 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: [4.1.10] Stability rating I

RE: [TC 5] XMLSchema validation and Xerces 2.1.0

2002-09-04 Thread David Oxley
Also, you probably ought to include the XML parser (Xerces 2.1.0) with the LE edition of TC5 (If it does fix it). Does Sun JDK1.4 come with Xerces or Crimson? I thought I read that it was supplied with a version of Xerces, but the source that comes with it has org.apache.crimson. stuff in

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

2002-09-04 Thread David Oxley
Remy, I don't think Xerces-J-bin.2.1.0.tar.gz is in old_xerces2. The URL should be http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-j/Xerces-J-bin.2.1.0.tar.gz. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 14:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: Bug in WebappClassLoader

2002-08-28 Thread David Oxley
Remy, Never mind. Have just seen your commits! Easier than my solution! :) Thanks for getting it into 4.1. Dave. -Original Message- From: David Oxley Sent: 28 August 2002 13:05 To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: Bug in WebappClassLoader Remy, Here's the new patch. Has

Bug in WebappClassLoader

2002-08-27 Thread David Oxley
All, There is a couple of bugs in WebappClassLoader. 1. On line 953 there is a call to findClassInternal which could throw a ClassNotFoundException that gets caught on line 979. This means that lines 963 through 973 will never get executed. i.e. Repositories added with the method

RE: [4.1.9] Fix for major bugs

2002-08-21 Thread David Oxley
August 2002 16:59 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [4.1.9] Fix for major bugs David Oxley wrote: Hi Remy, I've just attached some comments to the bug log (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7082) that were posted to the user list a week or so ago. They seem

RE: [4.1.9] Fix for major bugs

2002-08-19 Thread David Oxley
Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 August 2002 17:07 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [4.1.9] Fix for major bugs David Oxley wrote: Has anyone looked at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7082. Can anyone look at fixing this for 4.1.x

RE: [4.1.9] Fix for major bugs

2002-08-15 Thread David Oxley
Has anyone looked at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7082. Can anyone look at fixing this for 4.1.x? Cheers. Dave. -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 August 2002 11:10 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: [4.1.9] Fix for

XML parsers and TC4.1.x

2002-07-23 Thread David Oxley
The XML parsers in TC4.1.x are in common/endorsed. I need these to be only available to the server and therefore in server/endorsed. Is this supposed to work? Also if using JDK1.4, does TC use the JDK's parser or the parser on the classpath as preference? Dave

RE: JDK 1.4 Logging

2002-07-22 Thread David Oxley
Why does Tomcat not use Log4j for its logging? Dave. -Original Message- From: Bob Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 July 2002 15:51 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: JDK 1.4 Logging Hi. I am trying to get Tomcat to log to JDK1.4's logging. I tried implementing

RE: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon

2002-07-03 Thread David Oxley
: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon Got it. I'll check in, please test again. Costin On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, David Oxley wrote: Costin, I'm using RedHat 7.3, Apache 2.1.39, TC 4.1.6, mod_jk1, CoyoteJK2. I build a new mod_jk.so everytime I get a new Tomcat. So it is definetley

RE: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon

2002-07-02 Thread David Oxley
=10018. Dave. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 July 2002 23:54 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, David Oxley wrote: Costin, This problem still happens with 4.1.6

RE: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon

2002-07-01 Thread David Oxley
Costin, This problem still happens with 4.1.6. Dave. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 June 2002 16:57 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, David Oxley wrote: Remy

RE: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon

2002-06-28 Thread David Oxley
I haven't had a chance to work out how to compile from CVS yet. To save me time, is there anywhere I can download a recent 4.1.6-dev build so I can quickly test it before it is tagged? Thanks. Dave. -Original Message- From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 June 2002 20:04

RE: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon

2002-06-26 Thread David Oxley
Remy, Bug 10018 is pretty serious. Coyote-JK2 won't serve a resource (might apply to dynamic content as well as static) that's bigger than 8k. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10018 Dave. -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26

RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-12 Thread David Oxley
Larry, Any chance of committing the attached patch before 3.3rc1. It makes jk_nt_service maintain a list of currently installed services in the registry. This is so the Service Manager I have written can work. I will be submitting the Service Manager in a few hours for committing in

RE: NT Service Manager

2001-09-10 Thread David Oxley
unless there are enough committers to continue support. I'm still willing to consider simple usability enhancements, time permitting :-), and not rule them out absolutely at this point. Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: David Oxley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10