RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Remove deprecated and unsupported components

2002-10-09 Thread iasandcb
ballot [X] Remove deprecated org.apache.catalina.connector components from the j-t-catalina module [ ] Leave them in /ballot IAS Jakarta-Seoul Project Coordinator http://jakarta.apache-korea.org -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: Need some clarifications

2002-10-07 Thread iasandcb
In order to thank you for your kind explanation, I'd like to share my TC5 pre-build and post-build result and some updated tips .(Notice: The following processes are wholly up to 7 Oct. 2002.) Test Build Environment: IBM ThinkPad R32 Windows XP JDK 1.4.1 Ant 1.5.1 WinCVS 1.3b8(dos command cvs is

RE: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-07 Thread iasandcb
Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4 and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together. At this point, I'd like to propose an idea. It's Tomcat subprojects plan. So far, Tomcat has had

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

2002-10-04 Thread iasandcb
I also agree that Tomcat should support as many platform as possible regardless of its J2SE version according to the philosophy of Java. Definitely Servlet 2.4 API wants Java 2(i.e. J2SE 1.2 or later), so it is enough for Tomcat to require at least J2SE 1.2 essentially. The problem is JSP 2.0.

RE: Localization in tomcat 4.1

2002-10-04 Thread iasandcb
See http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Intl/Multiling ualJSP/ , you can find some alternative to do so with JSTL under JSP technology. In addition, so far there's no such page-file-based l10n in JSP spec. Personally I tried JSTL l10n and it has worked fine on my site:

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

2002-10-03 Thread iasandcb
Oops! sorry, I missed my vote. ballot +1 [X] Yes, remove the LE distribution -1 [ ] No, keep both distributions /ballot -Original Message- From: iasandcb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:06 AM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

2002-10-03 Thread iasandcb
3:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution iasandcb wrote: First all, I vote ballot +1 [ ] Yes, remove the LE distribution -1 [ ] No, keep both distributions /ballot Next, I'd like to make this clear: Tomcat 5 is based on JSP 2.0 spec, which

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

2002-10-03 Thread iasandcb
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution iasandcb wrote: First all, I vote ballot +1 [ ] Yes, remove the LE distribution -1 [ ] No, keep both distributions /ballot Next, I'd like to make this clear: Tomcat 5 is based on JSP 2.0 spec, which

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

2002-10-03 Thread iasandcb
] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution - Original Message - From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:30 AM Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution iasandcb wrote: First all, I vote ballot +1 [ ] Yes, remove

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

2002-10-03 Thread iasandcb
Some reference is here: http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/jsp/ JavaServer PagesTM 2.0 Preview Implementation Early Access v1.0 which is based on Tomcat 4.1 requires J2SDK 1.4. -Original Message- From: iasandcb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002

RE: Tomcat 4.1.12 and Servlet Access 404 Errors: BUG? One Last Assurance

2002-10-02 Thread iasandcb
About this issue, I already pointed it out by commenting to JSR-154 servlet 2.4. Actually invoker-like features in web containers have provided servlet deployers with non-standard ways to invoke a servlet by sending a request message including /servlet/fully-qualified-class-name-of-a-servlet. A

RE: Question about Internationalization

2002-09-28 Thread iasandcb
Hi, I tested a GB2312-based JSP page on Tomcat 4.1.12, and it worked fine. (The attached file). It shows ni-hao-ma in simplified Chinese character system and the response encoding, i.e. GB2312. The key point I'd like to make clear is that encoding of a JSP page should keep up with that of

RE: [VOTE] [5.0] Milestones

2002-09-28 Thread iasandcb
I wish Tomcat 5 would be available as soon as possible. Thank those who have been developing it very much. Here's my vote: -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:12 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: [VOTE] [5.0]

[REPORT] errors on some documents in jakarta-tomcat-5 repository

2002-09-11 Thread iasandcb
In jakarta-tomcat-5 repository on BUILDING.txt, the link http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-5/nightly/src/ doesn't work at all. on RUNNING.txt, http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-5/nightly/ also doesn't work at all. I hope these can be corrected as soon as possilbe

[PROPOSAL]Integral approach to request-response encoding with content type

2002-09-11 Thread iasandcb
Hi I'm Changshin Lee, a JCP individual member. I'm also a member of JSR-179 Location API for J2ME EG. I've always appreciated your work, Tomcat. In this message, I'd like to make a proposal on resolving localization issues on SRV-JSP technology and its reference implementation. Actually I have