Boyd Waters wrote:
>
> [...this un-lurking is getting habit-forming...]
>
> "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> > What would you think about using a JNDI DirContext as a representation of the
> > resources available to a web application?
>
> Craig:
>
> I think that the *option* for Catalina to
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > > BTW: I really like the resources package! I can think of several useful
> > > implementations that I'd like to use, like one for CVS, or one for
> JavaMail,
> > > or ... lots more.
> >
> > I like the Resources abstraction as well. Before we go whole hog at
> creatin
[...this un-lurking is getting habit-forming...]
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> What would you think about using a JNDI DirContext as a representation of the
> resources available to a web application? The idea would be to use directory
> entry attributes for the commonly used information like
> > BTW: I really like the resources package! I can think of several useful
> > implementations that I'd like to use, like one for CVS, or one for
JavaMail,
> > or ... lots more.
>
> I like the Resources abstraction as well. Before we go whole hog at
creating new
> implementations, though, I'd
Jason Brittain wrote:
>
> BTW: I really like the resources package! I can think of several useful
> implementations that I'd like to use, like one for CVS, or one for JavaMail,
> or ... lots more.
I like the Resources abstraction as well. Before we go whole hog at creating new
implementations
Hi Remy.
Oops, yes, you're right about this (of course). I misunderstood the use
of the
"started" variable to mean whether or not the background thread was already
started, instead of whether the component's lifecycle had started. Sorry.
BTW: I really like the resources package! I can think
