Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
So at some point soon (the next day or two), we want to put the current
tomcat 5 code on a branch called tomcat_5_0 (the actual branch name is
tentative but let's use tomcat_5_0 for example). We'll do this after
tagging TOMCAT_5_0_26 on the main branch.
The actual CVS
Hi,
For now, I think a branch is only needed in jakarta-tomcat-catalina (if
there are problems, I'll use a build2.xml in jakarta-tomcat-5 with
temporary hacks).
Would it be better if you did your refactoring in a branch and then
merged into the main branch, overwriting as needed, when you're
I assume next release from HEAD will be labeled 5.1 ?
If you plan changes big enough to require a branch, probably a 5.0 -
5.1 is also needed.
Costin
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
So at some point soon (the next day or two), we want to put the current
tomcat 5 code on a branch called tomcat_5_0 (the
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
For now, I think a branch is only needed in jakarta-tomcat-catalina (if
there are problems, I'll use a build2.xml in jakarta-tomcat-5 with
temporary hacks).
Would it be better if you did your refactoring in a branch and then
merged into the main branch, overwriting as
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: CVS branching
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
For now, I think a branch is only needed in jakarta-tomcat-catalina (if
there are problems, I'll use a build2.xml in jakarta-tomcat-5 with
temporary hacks).
Would it be better if you did
, 2004 1:19 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: CVS branching
I'm planning to refator some and add a bunch of work into HEAD since this
where we do dev,
I suggest we go with remy's suggestion, to branch off 5.0.x and continue
new dev into HEAD
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Remy
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
OK, if we already have an established practice to continue development on HEAD, that's OK. I'll branch TOMCAT_5_0 when I tag 5.0.27 then.
Wouldn't you branch it now prior to any non-5.0 work being done on HEAD?
--
Jess Holle
: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 1:45 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: CVS branching
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
OK, if we already have an established practice to continue development
on
HEAD, that's OK. I'll branch TOMCAT_5_0 when I tag 5.0.27
Wouldn't you branch it now prior to any non-5.0 work being done on HEAD?
yes
- Original Message -
From: Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: CVS branching
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
OK, if we
Hi,
So at some point soon (the next day or two), we want to put the current
tomcat 5 code on a branch called tomcat_5_0 (the actual branch name is
tentative but let's use tomcat_5_0 for example). We'll do this after
tagging TOMCAT_5_0_26 on the main branch.
The actual CVS command is easy:
cvs
: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 6:00 AM
Subject: CVS branching
Hi,
So at some point soon (the next day or two), we want to put the current
tomcat 5 code on a branch called tomcat_5_0 (the actual branch name is
tentative but let's use tomcat_5_0 for example). We'll do this after
tagging TOMCAT_5_0_26
-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 1:35 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: CVS branching
Since Gump(y) hasn't built for months, it can't complain more than it
already is doing ;-).
The real question is whether we want to run Gump on the 5.0 branch
12 matches
Mail list logo
