DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37018] New: - Document how to use tomcat-SSL with a pkcs11 token

2005-10-11 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=37018 Summary: Document how to use tomcat-SSL with a pkcs11 token Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other URL: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/p11gu ide.html OS/Version: other

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36574] New: - Broken PDF document in online docware

2005-09-09 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=36574 Summary: Broken PDF document in online docware Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: All URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5- doc/architecture/startup.html OS/Version: All

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35725] - jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document

2005-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35725. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35725] - jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document

2005-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35725. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35725] - jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document

2005-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35725. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35725] - jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document

2005-07-14 Thread bugzilla
this requirement ? spec-quote spec=JSP version=2.0 section=6.2.3 The first step in processing a JSP document is to process it as an XML document, checking for well-formedness, processing entity resolution and, if applicable, performing validation as described in Section JSP.6.2.4. /spec-quote - Current

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35725] - jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document

2005-07-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35725. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35725] New: - jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document

2005-07-13 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=35725 Summary: jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35725] - jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document

2005-07-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35725. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35725] - jasper throws org.apache.jasper.JasperException with XHTML document

2005-07-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35725. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35014] - Please document the change in the context file XML format

2005-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35014] - Please document the change in the context file XML format

2005-05-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35014] New: - Please document the change in the context file XML format

2005-05-22 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=35014 Summary: Please document the change in the context file XML format Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34643] - document how to use certificate-based clientAuth on a per user or per session basis also with self-signed/expired client certs

2005-05-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34643. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34643] - document how to use certificate-based clientAuth on a per user or per session basis also with self-signed/expired client certs

2005-05-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34643. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34643] - document how to use certificate-based clientAuth on a per user or per session basis also with self-signed/expired client certs

2005-05-09 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=34643 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|document how to use |document how to use |certificate-based

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34643] New: - document how to use certificate-based clientAuth on a per user or per session basis

2005-04-27 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=34643 Summary: document how to use certificate-based clientAuth on a per user or per session basis Product: Tomcat 5 Version: Nightly Build Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34643] - document how to use certificate-based clientAuth on a per user or per session basis

2005-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34643. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34643] - document how to use certificate-based clientAuth on a per user or per session basis

2005-04-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34643. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Private document

2005-01-25 Thread ccain
I cannot believe that. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

important document

2005-01-20 Thread pier
Please read the attached file! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Error in document

2004-12-12 Thread pier . fumagalli
Your important document, correction is finished! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Document

2004-11-27 Thread firewalls
Here is the file. --- Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (higp1.gatelock.com.tw) ** your_document.pif Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (higp1.gatelock.com.tw) ** your_document.pif WORM_NETSKY.D

Document

2004-11-27 Thread craig . mcclanahan
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Notice.txt .exe (in Notice.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-11-17 Thread mikeb
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa08) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Informations.txt .exe (in Informations.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-10-24 Thread hgomez
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Textfile.txt .exe (in Textfile.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-10-21 Thread hgomez
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Bill.txt .exe (in Bill.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-10-19 Thread hgomez
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Data.txt .exe (in Data.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-10-14 Thread craig . mcclanahan
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Bill.txt .exe (in Bill.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-10-05 Thread craig . mcclanahan
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Details.txt .exe (in Details.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-09-30 Thread mikeb
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Bill.txt .exe (in Bill.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-09-20 Thread mmanders
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Details.txt .exe (in Details.zip) The file is deleted.

Document

2004-09-13 Thread craig . mcclanahan
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Data.txt .exe (in Data.zip) The uncleanable file is

Document

2004-09-05 Thread mmanders
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Data.txt .exe (in Data.zip) The uncleanable file is

Document

2004-09-04 Thread hgomez
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Part-2.txt .exe (in Part-2.zip) The uncleanable file

[ #BJO-39658-731]: Document

2004-09-03 Thread techsupport . norway
Dette er en automatisk svar-epost i fra Panda Software Norge - Support. Din sak har fått nr: BJO-39658-731 Du vil motta svar på denne epost adressen når vi har fått behandlet saken. Henvis til nummeret ovenfor ved telefonhenvendelser. Ved videre henvendelser om denne saken svarer du på denne

[ #MOV-96470-480]: Document

2004-09-02 Thread techsupport . norway
Dette er en automatisk svar-epost i fra Panda Software Norge - Support. Din sak har fått nr: MOV-96470-480 Du vil motta svar på denne epost adressen når vi har fått behandlet saken. Henvis til nummeret ovenfor ved telefonhenvendelser. Ved videre henvendelser om denne saken svarer du på denne

Document

2004-08-31 Thread hgomez
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Details.txt .exe (in Details.zip) The uncleanable

Document

2004-08-19 Thread craig . mcclanahan
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Details.txt .exe (in Details.zip) The uncleanable

Document

2004-08-16 Thread mikeb
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) -- Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Bill.txt .exe (in Bill.zip) The uncleanable file is

Re: Document

2004-07-29 Thread craigmcc
Please read the attached file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Document

2004-07-26 Thread pier
Important notice! KWF Email scanner found a virus in following attachment: Notice.zip Content type: application/octet-stream Additional information from antivirus: W95/Spaces.gen Attachement has been removed by firewall.

Document

2004-07-10 Thread remm
Important! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29763] - The encoding of jsp document

2004-06-28 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 The encoding of jsp document --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-28 09:42 --- Jan, now I agree with you and thanks for the explanation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29763] - The encoding of jsp document

2004-06-25 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 The encoding of jsp document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29763] - The encoding of jsp document

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 The encoding of jsp document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Other |Medium

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29763] - The encoding of jsp document

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 The encoding of jsp document --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-24 11:48 --- This issue blocks a issue for jsp editor in the Netbeans IDE. http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43269

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29763] - The encoding of jsp document

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 The encoding of jsp document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29763] - The encoding of jsp document

2004-06-24 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 The encoding of jsp document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29763] New: - The encoding of jsp document

2004-06-23 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=29763 The encoding of jsp document Summary: The encoding of jsp document Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.25 Platform: All OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: Other Component

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11656] - UTF-8 encoding not supported correctly in included text file or JSP Document

2004-05-25 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=11656 UTF-8 encoding not supported correctly in included text file or JSP Document --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-25 08:23 --- Hi, I have a similar problem with UTF-8. I explain. I have a file (index.html) with a link to a servlet in it. This file

PATCH - jk\xdocs\jk2\configwebcom.xml - document recent status worker change

2004-05-13 Thread NormW
Greetings All, The link below is a patch for the above referenced document to add in details of the recent change to the status worker regarding style sheets. http://normw.gknw.com/patches/configwebcom.xml.diff The diff has been tested to display correctly in IE6 and Mozilla 1.6. Norm

Re: Re: Document

2004-05-05 Thread craigmcc
Please read the attached file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Here is the document

2004-04-23 Thread remm
Please have a look at the attached file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Here is the document

2004-04-23 Thread correo
Hemos recibido su correo electrónico, en breve nos pondremos en contacto con usted. Puede ver mas informacion visite nuestra página www.refugiodegredos.com. Allí encontrará informacion de nuestro Hostal Refugio de Gredos, el Apartamento Almanzor y la Casa Rural Almanzor. Si quiere reservar,

Re: Your document

2004-04-21 Thread craigmcc
Please have a look at the attached file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[NOD32: deleted] Re: Your document

2004-04-16 Thread costin
Your document is attached. Notification from NOD32 Warning: ADESGO's Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server found the following infiltrations in this message: part000.txt - is OK your_document.pif - Win32/Netsky.D worm - unable to clean - deleted http://www.nod32.com

Re: Here is the document

2004-04-16 Thread akv
Please have a look at the attached file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Your document

2004-04-15 Thread rsowders
Please read the attached file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Antw: Re: Re: Document

2004-04-14 Thread Christoph Honegger
Bin vom 09.04.-.18.04.2004. abwesend. Dringliches bitte zu Frau Dr. M. Prögler, Leitende Ärztin, Frauenklinik. Nicht Dringliches bearbeite ich nach meiner Rückkehr. Mit bestem Dank und freundlichen Grüssen Ch. Honegger - To

Stolen document

2004-04-14 Thread glenn
I cannot believe that. Norton AntiVirus excluído1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Spam vulnerability at apache (was: Re: Photo document [TID#4977])

2004-04-13 Thread Jeff Tulley
): ! ?? ??? ? ??? ? ? ?? ?? ?? Photo document, ??? . ??? ?? ?? . ?? ? ??, ? ??? ? [TID#4977]. ??, ? ? : [TID#4977] ? ? (subject

Re: Spam vulnerability at apache (was: Re: Photo document [TID#4977])

2004-04-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
Jeff Tulley wrote: If I am not mistaken, this email probably results from somebody on the list having one of the many recent viruses. Actually, that is not necessary to see messages like this. All that needs to happen is that someone who is infected has both the email address of a subscriber

Re: Spam vulnerability at apache (was: Re: Photo document [TID#4977])

2004-04-13 Thread Jeff Tulley
Quite correct, though usually it IS the case that they are a subscriber, and that is why they have the address in their book. I personally am quite surprised that a group of individuals technical enough to participate in these forums would be falling prey to the viruses so often, so maybe you are

Re: Spam vulnerability at apache (was: Re: Photo document [TID#4977])

2004-04-13 Thread Adam Hardy
is in the same category. Thanks, rsa/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: russian(win-1251): ! ?? ??? ? ??? ? ? ?? ?? ?? Photo document

Photo document [TID#4977]

2004-04-12 Thread TS
russian(win-1251): ! Photo document, . . , [TID#4977]. , : [TID#4977] (subject) . (reply). C , -10 http://www.m-10.ru english: Greetings, This message has been

Spam vulnerability at apache (was: Re: Photo document [TID#4977])

2004-04-12 Thread Reshat Sabiq
is in the same category. Thanks, rsa/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: russian(win-1251): ! Photo document, . . , [TID#4977]. , : [TID#4977] (subject) . (reply). C , -10 http://www.m-10.ru

Re: Document

2004-04-04 Thread shachor
attachment: vkfdogaund.bmp- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-29 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-27 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-27 10:48 --- No, you have to put the docBase in your context.xml (as simple copying is used, rather than saving it again, which is riskier

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-27 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-27 16:03 --- I have decided to refactor a little bit the deployer to address these issues (the check for an existing /META-INF/context.xml will be done

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-27 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-27 17:16 --- Remy, thanks. Will it also fix the case when deploying using the manager application

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-26 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-26 09:10 --- I read the docs: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/manager-howto.html and there's no notion about localWar option. I assume I'm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-26 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-26 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-26 18:14 --- Remy, Intuitively, I would expect that if I only use the war parameter (without config and path), and my application contains META-INF/context.xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-26 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-26 15:38 --- Well, this is not going to be fixed, so you have to stop using config. I'll look quickly at the rest of the problem

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-26 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-26 15:19 --- Yes, bad reading. config is still harmful. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] New: - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-25 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces Summary: Problem start app with document base containing spaces Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.19 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-25 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-25 21:45 --- Don't use the config attribute, it will only cause trouble (Tomcat will use the one in /META-INF/context.xml fine

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

2004-02-25 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=27216 Problem start app with document base containing spaces [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26819] New: - the charset of included document is not inherited from parent document

2004-02-10 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=26819 the charset of included document is not inherited from parent document Summary: the charset of included document is not inherited from parent document Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.18 Platform: PC OS/Version

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26819] - the charset of included document is not inherited from parent document

2004-02-10 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=26819 the charset of included document is not inherited from parent document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26819] - the charset of included document is not inherited from parent document

2004-02-10 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=26819 the charset of included document is not inherited from parent document --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-10 22:01 --- Remy is right! There are a number of changes regarding page character encoding and that file inclusion does not inherit

RE: Internal document anchors ?

2004-01-26 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, Noticed this morning that in at least one Tomcat document: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html some internal document anchors a name= ? end with a question mark, which means any link to them will fail due to the question mark being dropped by the server. I

RE: Internal document anchors ?

2004-01-26 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, Noticed this morning that in at least one Tomcat document: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html some internal document anchors a name= ? end with a question mark, which means any link to them will fail due to the question mark being dropped by the server. I use

Re: Internal document anchors ?

2004-01-26 Thread NormW
, and hence ought to be avoided in normal links regardless. Interestingly, I saved the page locally with the idea of making a 'fixed' copy but IE6 saved the file with the space and (?) removed. Norm Howdy, Noticed this morning that in at least one Tomcat document: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat

RE: Internal document anchors ?

2004-01-26 Thread Shapira, Yoav
: NormW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 3:53 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Internal document anchors ? Good morning Yoav from Oz, and thanks for the reply. Can confirm that my IE6sp1 does show and work with a link correctly when a non-space character is next

Re: Internal document anchors ?

2004-01-26 Thread NormW
Hello again and thanks for the interest... ... and the time given Tomcat. Norm - Original Message - From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 7:49 AM Subject: RE: Internal document anchors ? Howdy, OK, I've done

Re: Internal document anchors ?

2004-01-26 Thread Kyle VanderBeek
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 03:49:27PM -0500, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, OK, I've done the following to the index.xml template from which this index.html file is generated: - Removed the space before question marks, - Replaced the ? with its HTML-encoded equivalent, #63; Shouldn't these, as

Internal document anchors ?

2004-01-25 Thread NormW
Good morning! Noticed this morning that in at least one Tomcat document: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html some internal document anchors a name= ? end with a question mark, which means any link to them will fail due to the question mark being dropped by the server

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22652] - JspWriter problem? A JSP Document with contentType=text/html makes a wrong output

2003-09-09 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=22652 JspWriter problem? A JSP Document with contentType=text/html makes a wrong output [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22439] - NPE compiling JSP Document

2003-08-18 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=22439 NPE compiling JSP Document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22366] - UTF-16 encoding not properly processed if used in JSP document

2003-08-14 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=22366 UTF-16 encoding not properly processed if used in JSP document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22366] New: - UTF-16 encoding not properly processed if used in JSP document

2003-08-14 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=22366 UTF-16 encoding not properly processed if used in JSP document Summary: UTF-16 encoding not properly processed if used in JSP document Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.3 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22366] - UTF-16 encoding not properly processed if used in JSP document

2003-08-14 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=22366 UTF-16 encoding not properly processed if used in JSP document --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-13 00:36 --- What happens if you add is-xmlfalse/is-xml to your jsp-property-group

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22439] New: - NPE compiling JSP Document

2003-08-14 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=22439 NPE compiling JSP Document Summary: NPE compiling JSP Document Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: Other Component: Jasper2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22439] - NPE compiling JSP Document

2003-08-14 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=22439 NPE compiling JSP Document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13587] - version out of date in some document

2003-06-24 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=13587 version out of date in some document [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17929] New: - EL expression treated as plain text in template data attribute with Jsp Document syntax

2003-03-12 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=17929 EL expression treated as plain text in template data attribute with Jsp Document syntax Summary: EL expression treated as plain text in template data attribute with Jsp Document syntax Product: Tomcat 5 Version: Nightly Build

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17390] - If jsp:text is provided an invalid body in the context of a JSP document, a translation error is not raised.

2003-02-28 Thread bugzilla
/show_bug.cgi?id=17390 If jsp:text is provided an invalid body in the context of a JSP document, a translation error is not raised. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

  1   2   >