o that probably means we need JDBC session store. Correct? And if so, what
> (in your opinions) is the current state of JDBC Session Store? (Also - am I
> correct that it's only available under Tomcat 4.0? Will it eventually also
> be available under the 3.x series?)
It shouldn't b
oing on to provide Clustering ability for TC4, currently you can
use it for in memory replication of sessions, however this feature is considered
highly experimental.
> So that probably means we need JDBC session store. Correct? And if so, what (in your
>opinions)
> is the current state
Title: JDBC session store, release date projections, etc
I apologize in advance for the lengthy and less-than-technical message, but my experience has been that the info flowing over this list is better than pretty much any other source, so here goes:
We are in the process of evaluating
Bip Thelin typed the following on 10:46 AM 3/28/2001 -0800
>I couldn't find anything about how to add the PersistenManager in server.xml
>or in the manuals, however, after backtracking the maillist I found a "patch"
>by Kief that seems to have been forgotten, I'll cat it to the end of this mail.
>
Jone Lin typed the following on 03:35 PM 3/28/2001 -0800
>> No, we're much earlier in the development cycle than that - we haven't
>> implemented any distributed session support at all. The work we're doing
>> on PersistentManager is groundwork for distributed sessions. This work
>> is 90% finis
'C++' and many databases).
- Original Message -
From: Krishna R. Baddam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:25 PM
Subject: RE: JDBC-Session store
> Blob is a bad idea. Serialize the objects and
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 2:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JDBC-Session store
I've been looking at the FileStore implementation and you(Kief/Craig)
basically
store a java object in the textfile, using the same approach with a DB
usually(?!)
involves using a SQL3 capable RDBMS i
Grr, seems my message got stuck somewhere so I'll resend it.
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> [...]
> Kief, a while back (when the work on PersistentManager was going on), the
> need for a little refactoring work on Manager vs. StandardManager would be
> useful. Have you thought any more about
I've been looking at the FileStore implementation and you(Kief/Craig) basically
store a java object in the textfile, using the same approach with a DB usually(?!)
involves using a SQL3 capable RDBMS i.e. Oracle, since you probably want to store
the object as a Blob or might even work with a STRUCT
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> [...]
> Kief, a while back (when the work on PersistentManager was going on), the
> need for a little refactoring work on Manager vs. StandardManager would be
> useful. Have you thought any more about what we should do here?
I couldn't find anything about how to
> -Original Message-
>
> Bip Thelin typed the following on 05:07 PM 3/27/2001 -0800
> >Kief Morris wrote:
> >>
> >> Excellent! Let us know if you need any help.
> >
> >I will, BTW how is the work on distributed sessions coming along?
> >Is it possible to distribute sessions over x numbe
Bip Thelin typed the following on 05:07 PM 3/27/2001 -0800
>Kief Morris wrote:
>>
>> Excellent! Let us know if you need any help.
>
>I will, BTW how is the work on distributed sessions coming along?
>Is it possible to distribute sessions over x number of machines and
>that if one goes down you co
Kief Morris wrote:
>
> Excellent! Let us know if you need any help.
I will, BTW how is the work on distributed sessions coming along?
Is it possible to distribute sessions over x number of machines and
that if one goes down you could go to the other and happily continue
your session?
..
Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 07:05 PM 3/27/2001 -0800
>Kief, a while back (when the work on PersistentManager was going on), the
>need for a little refactoring work on Manager vs. StandardManager would be
>useful. Have you thought any more about what we should do here?
Yes, in fact
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Kief Morris wrote:
> Bip Thelin typed the following on 01:56 PM 3/26/2001 -0800
> >According to the STATUS.html(which doesn't seem to be up to date) no one seems
> >to have volunteered for the JDBC-Session store. If that is truly the case I
> >w
Bip Thelin typed the following on 01:56 PM 3/26/2001 -0800
>According to the STATUS.html(which doesn't seem to be up to date) no one seems
>to have volunteered for the JDBC-Session store. If that is truly the case I
>would like to volunteer for that part.
Excellent! Let us know i
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Bip Thelin wrote:
> According to the STATUS.html(which doesn't seem to be up to date) no one seems
> to have volunteered for the JDBC-Session store. If that is truly the case I
> would like to volunteer for that part.
>
> Thanks, Bip
>
Tha
According to the STATUS.html(which doesn't seem to be up to date) no one seems
to have volunteered for the JDBC-Session store. If that is truly the case I
would like to volunteer for that part.
Thanks, Bip
18 matches
Mail list logo
