Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi Mladen,
JK 1.2.13 has been taggeded as we agreed last week,
and the tarballs are available at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.13/
any particular reason why you didnt tag my last commit on jk_connect.c?
Henri Gomez wrote:
Yes ;-)
Yes what?
Broke a rule or recreate the tarballs, or both :)?
And put a note about this change also in the download location
In a form of? Any example?
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
re-sending :
Am I missing details?
Calling ap_rflush() at the end of ws_write() in mod_jk.c is causing me
problems when doing downloads from the server to a client.
Performance degradation and, less importantly, memory usage, are the
problems.
Seems
Mladen Turk wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi Mladen,
JK 1.2.13 has been taggeded as we agreed last week,
and the tarballs are available at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.13/
any particular reason why you didnt tag my last commit on jk_connect.c?
Or provide a jk 1.2.13a including this fix for novell ?
2005/5/18, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi Mladen,
JK 1.2.13 has been taggeded as we agreed last week,
and the tarballs are available at:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
JkFlush (On|Off|size) with On as default for each packet write.
That way we'd be able to flush after each write, flush after each
'size' bytes or not flush at all.
Won't it be better to have a ws_flush()?
Not sure what you mean by that. Like a generic
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
JkFlush (On|Off|size) with On as default for each packet write.
That way we'd be able to flush after each write, flush after each
'size' bytes or not flush at all.
Won't it be better to have a ws_flush()?
Not sure what you mean by
Henri Gomez wrote:
Or provide a jk 1.2.13a including this fix for novell ?
I would like to skip that, but I like the Jean-Frederic's idea
about putting the tarballs inside binaries/netware/
Anyhow, the plan was retag that as 1.2.14 if everything else
is OK, or make 1.2.14-rc-(xxx), after some test
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I think on/off is enough - Think of the questions nnn will bring in user
list -
So how about to just add the flag to JkOptions like +FlushPackets?
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe,
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I think on/off is enough - Think of the questions nnn will bring in
user list -
So how about to just add the flag to JkOptions like +FlushPackets?
+1.
Regards,
Mladen.
good idea.
Which state by default ?
2005/5/18, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I think on/off is enough - Think of the questions nnn will bring in
user list -
So how about to just add the flag to JkOptions
Henri Gomez wrote:
good idea.
Which state by default ?
off (-FlushPackets).
2005/5/18, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I think on/off is enough - Think of the questions nnn will bring in
user list -
So how about to just add
I really like being able to do: write(8K)*n + flush().
+1 on adding a FlushPackets config option set to off by default.
Thank you Mladen and Jean-Frederic.
Jean-Jacques
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/18/2005 7:41 AM
Henri Gomez wrote:
good idea.
Which state by default ?
off (-FlushPackets).
Hi,
Henri Gomez wrote:
Or provide a jk 1.2.13a including this fix for novell ?
I would like to skip that, but I like the Jean-Frederic's idea
about putting the tarballs inside binaries/netware/
my concern if any is that the patch should be tested by all platforms, not only
with NetWare -
Hi Mladen,
JK 1.2.13 has been taggeded as we agreed last week,
and the tarballs are available at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.13/
any particular reason why you didnt tag my last commit on jk_connect.c?
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
re-sending :
Am I missing details?
Calling ap_rflush() at the end of ws_write() in mod_jk.c is causing me
problems when doing downloads from the server to a client.
Performance degradation and, less importantly, memory usage, are the
problems.
Seems we are the only
Hi,
JK 1.2.13 has been taggeded as we agreed last week,
and the tarballs are available at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.13/
For those that don't have WIN32 compiler there is a set of binaries at:
Builds with Sun CC on Solaris 7/8 with Apache 2.0.54 and runs
with Tomcat 4.1.30.
Glenn
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:57:44AM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
JK 1.2.13 has been taggeded as we agreed last week,
and the tarballs are available at:
It built on XP and Solaris with Apache 2.0.54 and ran with Tomcat
5.0.30.
,
Josh.
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:23 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: JK 1.2.13 TAGGED
Builds with Sun CC on Solaris 7/8
19 matches
Mail list logo
