Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-19 Thread jean-frederic clere
Bojan Smojver wrote: I have subscribed myself to Tomcat User list a few days back with the intention to help a few people on it (given my +1 on TC 3.3 final). I have to say that the amount of e-mails and sometimes the superficial nature of them prevented me from actually doing any useful

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-19 Thread Bojan Smojver
jean-frederic clere wrote: Bojan Smojver wrote: I have subscribed myself to Tomcat User list a few days back with the intention to help a few people on it (given my +1 on TC 3.3 final). I have to say that the amount of e-mails and sometimes the superficial nature of them prevented me

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-19 Thread jean-frederic clere
Bojan Smojver wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Bojan Smojver wrote: I have subscribed myself to Tomcat User list a few days back with the intention to help a few people on it (given my +1 on TC 3.3 final). I have to say that the amount of e-mails and sometimes the superficial

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-19 Thread Bojan Smojver
jean-frederic clere wrote: Yes, Bugzilla asks the right questions... So a form like the Bugzilla one that mails to the user list (of course telling that you have to subscribe to the list otherwise you question will be ignored). Since they'd have to login to use the form (just like on

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-19 Thread costinm
I'm not sure about the mailing lists, probably keeping the current config is better (as everyone pointed out ). What I would like is 2 new 'projects' in bugzilla - one for jakarta-tomcat-connectors ( with webapp and jk sub-categories ) and one for jasper ( and jakarta-tomcat-jasper). Both are

Mailing list proposal

2001-10-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
I have subscribed myself to Tomcat User list a few days back with the intention to help a few people on it (given my +1 on TC 3.3 final). I have to say that the amount of e-mails and sometimes the superficial nature of them prevented me from actually doing any useful work. Don't know about the

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Bojan Smojver wrote: Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 08:59:27 +1000 From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Dev List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailing list proposal I have subscribed myself to Tomcat User list a few days back

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Bojan Smojver wrote: Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 08:59:27 +1000 From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Dev List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailing list proposal I have subscribed myself to Tomcat

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Bojan Smojver wrote: Most of this has come from my totally different experience with Velocity User mailing list. There are fewer messages and fewer developers answering questions, but most of the time users get a good response in minutes. Part of the cause for the

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Bojan Smojver wrote: Most of this has come from my totally different experience with Velocity User mailing list. There are fewer messages and fewer developers answering questions, but most of the time users get a good response in

Re: Mailing list proposal

2001-10-18 Thread Jan Labanowski
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Bojan Smojver wrote: I can't argue with that one since I'm very green here. But my thinking is coming from the basic mailing list notion: ask your question in the right forum. You see, people are by design swine, selfish, and lazy, and they will ask their question on