Hi,
> Code changes to jakarta-servletapi are still 'special' - since it must
> be an exact copy of the spec. But I see no reason for watchdog - it was
> supposed to be the semi-official test suite, but now Sun provides an
> official one, so watchdog is useless anyway.
Watchdog is dormant. As suc
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: New TLP draft
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Need to identify just how much of the jakarta-* CVS will go with
Tomcat. Watchdog + ServletAPI
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: New TLP draft
On Apr 8, 2005 11:19 PM, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
On Apr 8, 2005 11:19 PM, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:23 PM
> Subject: Re: New TLP draft
>
> > Remy Maucherat wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: New TLP draft
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Need to identify just how much of the jakarta-* CVS will go with
Tomcat. Watchdog + ServletAPI modules?
That&#x
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Need to identify just how much of the jakarta-* CVS will go with
Tomcat. Watchdog + ServletAPI modules?
That's undecided. Would the old projects would remain at Jakarta, or
would they be covered by the new project ?
Why would they remain in jakarta ? They have the same comm
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005 8:15 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks:
- renaming mailing lists
On Apr 6, 2005 8:15 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
>
> I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
> is ok, I will send it there.
>
> Then there are infrastructure taks:
> - renaming mailing lists
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: New TLP draft
> True. But do others really need to see the GUMP message if they don't want
> them? Since I sho
True. But do others really need to see the GUMP message if they don't want
them? Since I should be reading the GUMP failures - it is mandatory for me to
see them. But for any other dev lists one is subscribed to (but not
committing) - do you really care that the latest build failed? Since the
f
Tim Funk wrote:
The main use case is when I lurked in geronimo. When a build in geronimo
fails - it creates a *massive* email which I as a lurker really don't
care about. It also took forever to download of a highspeed line. I also
recevied wiki updates when subscribed to the cvs commits which I
OTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:47 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: SV: New TLP draft
+1
I think burrying new potential contributors in auto generated spam is a
bad practice.
Regards
Jan H. Hansen
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. april 20
hool of Management / School of Engineering
Cambridge, MA USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan H. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:47 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: SV: New TLP draft
>
> +1
>
+1
I think burrying new potential contributors in auto generated spam is a
bad practice.
Regards
Jan H. Hansen
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. april 2005 19:41
Til: Tomcat Developers List
Emne: Re: New TLP draft
Looks good. Just an idea, it
Tim Funk wrote:
Looks good. Just an idea, it may be nice to have the 3 new lists
tomcat-bug - bug updates from bugzilla. When I subscribe to other groups
tomcat-cvs - Same as tomcat-bug but just for cvs commits.
tomcat-gump - For deaths by gump. If your not a committer - these are
This has been
Looks good. Just an idea, it may be nice to have the 3 new lists
tomcat-bug - bug updates from bugzilla. When I subscribe to other groups - I
sometimes do not care about bug updates and need to write filters to
automatically delete them. I am guessing some others might be more interested
in the
Kin-man Chung wrote:
It appears that my name (Kin-man Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]) has been
dropped from the PMC. Hope this is not intentional. :-)
Done.
RÃmy
--- Draft TLP resolution ---
X. Establish the Apache Tomcat Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
i
It appears that my name (Kin-man Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]) has been
dropped from the PMC. Hope this is not intentional. :-)
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 05:15, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
>
> I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. I
you mean at the speed of light. It's already April, so they only have
5-6 months if they really want to get plugin out that matches the
current CVS support.
peter
On Apr 6, 2005 11:37 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They'd have to improve a lot very fast (from what was posted, CV
Yoav Shapira wrote:
BTW, the struts project recently went through this and ended up with I think
are a decent set of by-laws.
Very good :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
Ian F. Darwin wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks:
- renaming mailing lists
Is that just keeping both lists and moving
Hi,
> Is that just keeping both lists and moving them up the domain hierarchy,
> or is there a move to
> change the list names while we're at it?
I think we're keeping the same list names, but moving the domain.
> > - PMC chairs will serve for one year, and cannot serve consecutive one
> > year
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks:
- renaming mailing lists
Is that just keeping both lists and moving them up the domain h
not sure if this is important or not, but how should the migration of
the mailing list happen? everyone subscribing to tomcat-user an
tomcat-dev automatically get subscribed to the new one?
peter
On Apr 6, 2005 8:15 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a new draft with
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks:
- renaming mailing lists
- moving CVS
- new DNS and virtual host
To summarize things:
- I will be the proposed
25 matches
Mail list logo
