>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Holger Brozio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:40 PM
>>>To: Tomcat Developers List
>>>Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
>>>
>>>
>>>is higher. If you w
Well d/l optimizeit and realized it would take a few weeks for me to
understand what it is trying to tell me..
> Just to double check against tomcat 4.1.12, the memory usage
> seems normal to me John. After tomcat starts up, it is using
> 23megs. My webapp loads when tomcat starts up, so you
l try optimizeit and see what it shows.. Thanks for all your time..
John
> -Original Message-
> From: peter lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:36 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
>
>
>
> This is
This is from the examples jsp right? or are they from your webapp?
the latest optimizeit has a leak finder feature. you may want to
download the trail version and give it a shot. from the data it looks
like a lot of objects are promoted to old memory from heap. It doesn't
necessarily constitute a
cat-Standalone
As you can see there is about a 4 meg diff between the two
This is using j2sdk 1.4.1 on windows XP with 512 ram using tomcat
4.1.14LE
> -Original Message-
> From: peter lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:56 AM
> To: Tomcat
> > Compiled
> > Memory starts at 37872 and ends at 39048
> >
> > Not compiled
> > Memory starts at 39635 and ends at 58760
> >
> > Does this not look like a memory leak in the jsp compile code??
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jo
Message-
> > From: Holger Brozio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:14 PM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
> >
> >
> > I also have no memory leak problems now with Tomcat 4.1.12.
>
f jsp classes.
HTH
Holger
- Original Message -
From: "John Trollinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: RE: Javac memory leak
> Ok,
>
> I did some tes
gt; Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
>
>
> I also have no memory leak problems now with Tomcat 4.1.12.
> But i'm using jikes instead of javac as jsp page compiler.
>
> Whats about switching to jikes. If the memory leak problem is
> gone with jikes, javac still leaks memory
on 2002/11/20 7:34 AM, "John Trollinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have 2, one is webdav and the other is our actual application. We
> use a lot of custom tags and a lot of both types of includes (when I say
> a lot we have jsp pages that include over 500 other jsp pages, and no,
> this is
I also have no memory leak problems now with Tomcat 4.1.12.
But i'm using jikes instead of javac as jsp page compiler.
Whats about switching to jikes. If the memory leak problem is gone
with jikes, javac still leaks memory, otherwise it is a problem in the jsp
pages.
Cheers
Holger
- Original
you never know. if it's a slow leak, precompiled pages may not exhibit
the leak. I only discovered the leak in our custom tag when I put the
app under moderate/medium load. Under light load the bug wasn't
apparent.
I'm guessing if you hit each page individuall slowly, the bug doesn't
appear. If
gt; Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
>
>
>
>
> John Trollinger wrote:
> >
> > We have 2, one is webdav and the other is our actual
> application. We
> > use a lot of custom tags and a lot of both types of
> includes (when I
> > say a lot we have jsp
John Trollinger wrote:
>
> We have 2, one is webdav and the other is our actual application. We
> use a lot of custom tags and a lot of both types of includes (when I say
> a lot we have jsp pages that include over 500 other jsp pages, and no,
> this is not my design :) )
>
>
I'm guessing th
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:12 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
>
>
>
> by any chance do you have multiple webapps or just one? in
> my case, I only have one webapp which has some services it
> lo
sage-
> > From: peter lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:57 AM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
> >
> >
> >
> > Hmm, that sounds bizzare. I'm been using/testing
> > 4
st
> Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
>
>
>
> Hmm, that sounds bizzare. I'm been using/testing
> 4.1.10-4.1.12 on both solaris and windows with jdk1.4.1.
> I've ran several stress test using JMeter simulating light to
> medium (64 concurrent connections) load
Hmm, that sounds bizzare. I'm been using/testing 4.1.10-4.1.12 on both
solaris and windows with jdk1.4.1. I've ran several stress test using
JMeter simulating light to medium (64 concurrent connections) load for
1-10K requests without any problems. My pages are heavy on JSTL, so they
are fairly
n get an example of this..
John
> -Original Message-
> From: peter lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:43 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Javac memory leak
>
>
>
> I haven't seen the memory leak on sola
I haven't seen the memory leak on solaris or windows, but isn't the leak
only on linux?
I thought jasper2 fixes the problem with com.sun.tools.javac.Main since
it uses the system native javac?
peter
John Trollinger wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if the javac memory leak still exists (1.4.1 docs
20 matches
Mail list logo
