[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've recently setup a intranet site on an NT 4.0 box using Apache 1.3.23 combined
with Tomcat 4.0.3. To integrate them together I'm using the warp connector and the
mod_webapp module I found at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've recently setup a intranet site on an NT 4.0 box using Apache 1.3.23
combined with Tomcat 4.0.3. To integrate them together I'm using the warp
connector and the mod_webapp module...
Forget it... It doesn't work under Windows...
If it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all I attempt to calmly summarize the problem and only then let my emotions
get through.
My insufficient knowledge of AIX platforms prevents me from successfully compiling
mod_webapp (as well mod_jk) on AIX 4.3.3 platform.
Hardware: IBM pSeries 660
](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 9:04 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Problem compiling mod_webapp
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 08:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all I attempt to calmly summarize the problem and only then let my emotions
get through.
My insufficient knowledge of AIX platforms prevents me from successfully compiling
mod_webapp (as well mod_jk) on AIX 4.3.3
Lurking indeed... ;)
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 10:34:42AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 08:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all I attempt to calmly summarize the problem and only then let my
emotions get through.
You're certainly not the first to be
,
michael.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2001 17:41
To: Michael Steindl
Subject: Re: problem with mod_webapp on rh7.1
Recent versions from the jakarta-tomcat-connectors CVS repository have
worked for me. Can you give
. Juli 2001 17:41
To: Michael Steindl
Subject: Re: problem with mod_webapp on rh7.1
Recent versions from the jakarta-tomcat-connectors CVS repository have
worked for me. Can you give them a try?
Craig
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Michael Steindl wrote:
hi craig,
having the same problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Yes, but jk_open_socket would have to be modified:
1 - to pass a apr_pool to allocate the apr_connect.
2 - to return a status instead a socket.
Sure, you can pass a jk_pool ( and make jk_log a field of jk_pool,
One thing that mod_webapp has going for it is that it is based on APR
(this makes the webapp code much simpler). In my experience with
mod_jk, I've always had problems getting the right defines for my
platform (as there is no configure script - somehow, I remember J.F.
Clere adding some stuff
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:29:39AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
APR will be the future, but it still in changing state.
Do you want to works on a moving API ?
We need a release and binary builds for majors OS
When I have commit access to APR, yeah, I do. =) (That change to the
When I have commit access to APR, yeah, I do. =) (That change to the
util_date.h is because of me - actually, I think that you should just
assume that they have the latest build of Apache 2.0 if they are using
Apache 2.0 - it is still beta and I use that term loosely...)
I added a #define to
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:09:44PM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Realistically though, APR is fairly stable API-wise. There *are*
going to be some minor changes and tweaks along the way. But, they
should all be for the better (like the util_date migration).
I'm confident that APR is stable,
Hmm, I wonder if we should do a TR with APR to give a release
that is separate from httpd-2.0. I don't see any reason why we
couldn't do this. I just have no clue how to do the TR. My
understanding is that anyone with commit privs can do that.
I'll look into it though.
BUT, I think
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
What about working an APR wrapper ? ie something which wrap OS calls
to APR or native calls ? And make mod_jk call wrapper functions ?
I think that defeats the purpose of APR. If APR isn't doing it right,
then APR needs to be fixed. APR
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:09:44PM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Realistically though, APR is fairly stable API-wise. There *are*
going to be some minor changes and tweaks along the way. But, they
should all be for the better (like the util_date migration).
I'm
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
How could one write a wrapper for the following?:
+++
-int jk_open_socket(struct sockaddr_in *addr,
+apr_status_t jk_open_socket(apr_socket_t **new, apr_sockaddr_t *addr,
int ndelay,
- jk_logger_t *l)
+
How could one write a wrapper for the following?:
+++
-int jk_open_socket(struct sockaddr_in *addr,
+apr_status_t jk_open_socket(apr_socket_t **new,
apr_sockaddr_t *addr,
int ndelay,
- jk_logger_t *l)
+ jk_logger_t *l, apr_pool_t
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
jeez... it's been a while since i've used ajp13 with tomcat 4 :)
if memory serves... you want to add an ajp13 connector as a child of a
service, e.g.:
Service name=Tomcat-Standalone
Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
so is there still interest in a patch for the mod_webapp docs or has focus
been shifted over to mod_jk?
I'd like to see a patch, but that's me. =) Pier probably can tell you
what he's doing with mod_webapp. I'm not a fan of
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:35:29PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
What if (random thoughts coming out now), instead of requiring people to
build APR (since that seems the biggest source of problems), we don't simply
ask them where the tarball is, and then in our configure script, we
jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:35:29PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
What if (random thoughts coming out now), instead of requiring people to
build APR (since that seems the biggest source of problems), we don't
simply
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector
port=8009 acceptCount=10 debug=0/
and i built mod_jk.so and put it in my libexec directory, but i don't know
how to configure mod_jk in apache's httpd.conf for
i tried putting a Host element underneath the Engine but it didn't like
that at all. i think this must be wrong since i'm trying to
associate an
Ajp13Connector with a WarpEngine. how should this be configured? sorry,
i've not been able to find any docs for this configuration.
Hi Donald,
Your
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Donald Ball wrote:
okay, i've got apache talking to tomcat, but i always get this message:
Tomcat Error Report
HTTP Status 500 - No Host matches server name foobar.webslingerZ.com
never mind, i fixed this problem. i have a new problem, but i started a
thread on
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
i tried putting a Host element underneath the Engine but it didn't like
that at all. i think this must be wrong since i'm trying to
associate an
Ajp13Connector with a WarpEngine. how should this be configured? sorry,
i've not been able to find any
jeez... it's been a while since i've used ajp13 with tomcat 4 :)
if memory serves... you want to add an ajp13 connector as a child of a
service, e.g.:
Service name=Tomcat-Standalone
Connector className=org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector
port=8009 acceptCount=10
Hi Kevin,
Are you interested to update the connector to use Ajp14 ( in backward
compat mode and/or ajp14 mode ) ? I think I found both short term and
long term solutions for the config issue ( well, it seems mod_jk supports
the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, it seems mod_jk supports
the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
beginning
Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbucks
(or Microsoft)... Thank you so much for pointing out what an
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
well, it seems mod_jk supports
the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
beginning
Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbucks
(or Microsoft)... Thank you so much for pointing out
Donald Ball at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
well, it seems mod_jk supports
the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
beginning
Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbucks
(or
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, it seems mod_jk supports
the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the
beginning
Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbucks
(or
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:38:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't take this personally - I put some (free) time into
this, and if I don't like your solution doesn't mean I consider you an
idiot ( or that I'll not use the same solution, as it's considerably
easier to implement
Hi Kevin,
Are you interested to update the connector to use Ajp14 ( in backward
compat mode and/or ajp14 mode ) ? I think I found both short term and
long term solutions for the config issue ( well, it seems mod_jk supports
the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
yeah, i'd be interested in updating the ajp connector for tomcat 4 do
ajp14, if i could find the time ;-)
That's the fun of doing open source...
i'm not sure i see the benefit in making ajp13 support autoconfig --
probably not worth the effort.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
yeah, i'd be interested in updating the ajp connector for tomcat 4 do
ajp14, if i could find the time ;-)
That's the fun of doing open source...
heh heh :)
i'm not sure i see the benefit in making ajp13 support
use a non-threaded apr with apache 1.3.
Donald Ball wrote:
hey guys. i'm trying to get the latest mod_webapp from cvs to work with
the latest apr from cvs and apache-1.3.12. i'm getting this error when i
try to test the configuration:
[root@chngw lib]# apachectl configtest
Syntax error
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
use a non-threaded apr with apache 1.3.
thanks. i built apr with --disable-threads and now i get this:
[root@chngw apr]# apachectl configtest
Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
advantage of APRVARS (which has this information). It doesn't
seem to be doing so. -- justin
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
On Thu, 28
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
advantage of APRVARS (which has this information). It doesn't
seem to be doing so. -- justin
pardon my ignorance, what
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:52:01PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
advantage of APRVARS (which has this information). It
Fuck yeah... I'm building a new autoconf for Mod_WebApp using the APRVARS...
Thanks Justin
Pier
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
advantage of
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:52:01PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and built and
installed libmm seperately in /usr/local/lib. okay, geez, now i get this
error:
It includes it, but mod_webapp doesn't link it. It seems that Pier is
whipping
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so
AddModule webapp_module
AddModule mod_webapp.c
suggest that y'all fix /webapp/docs/apache-1.3.html if that's the proper
line - which it appears it is - i now get this:
[root@chngw apache]#
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and built and
installed libmm seperately in /usr/local/lib. okay, geez, now i get this
error:
It includes it, but mod_webapp
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and built and
installed libmm seperately in /usr/local/lib. okay, geez, now i
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:31:50AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, that's what httpd-2.0 does. Just require them to slap the apr
sources in srclib (or something like that).
We don't have to stick it into the CVS, but we can have a make srcdist
target that builds up a tarball with all sources (including
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
- donald
-- Forwarded message --
with this in my httpd.conf:
LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so
AddModule mod_webapp.c
WebAppConnection
Donald Ball at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
- donald
-- Forwarded message --
with this in my httpd.conf:
LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
As Pier said, just add ServerName.
Be nice if you took all of this info and submitted a patch for the docs.
I'd
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
As Pier said, just add ServerName.
Be nice if you took all
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Oh, I believe you specified your WebAppDeploy _before_ your ServerName
directive... If you switch them it should be fine...
aha! voila! WebAppInfo now works great, but WebAppDeploy still fails, i
now get timeouts when i try to hit urls assigned to
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
As Pier said, just add ServerName.
Be nice if you took all of this info and submitted a patch for the docs.
I'd bet
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, that's what httpd-2.0 does. Just require them to slap the apr
sources in srclib (or something like that).
APR isn't standalone just yet. I was shocked when I saw that
mod_webapp required an install of APR. =) -- justin
I've checked
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:03:47AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, that's what httpd-2.0 does. Just require them to slap the apr
sources in srclib (or something like that).
We don't have to stick it into the CVS, but we can have a
57 matches
Mail list logo
