Thanks everybody for some excellent answers on the classloading topic. The security
issues are not something I had considered, in naturally thinking that 'look then
delegate' is the logical way to go.
On the issue of classpath ordering via my .properties file, I was thinking that it
would not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>
> > > I believe there are important security issues, but I'm sure the spec took
> > > this into consideration - so probably I'm wrong ( of course, this will be
> > > easy to verify later on, there are quite a few ways someo
Hola a Todos,David:
Thanks for take a look in this area, is hard to test and has little to
nothing review and is plenty of big traps ( as the last found ) ..
One of the most hard things that TC33 does is to hide the complexity of
JDK11 and 12 compatibility without to much hassle for the poor de
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Servlet 2.3 PFD2, defines sensitive for the purposes of conformance: J2SE
> and servlet API classes.
Well, that's not very good if you have a "sensitive" driver ( a native
JDBC for friver for example ) or similar. But if this is the definition
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
>
> > > I believe there are important security issues, but I'm sure the spec took
> > > this into consideration - so probably I'm wrong ( of course, this will be
> > > easy to verify later on, there are qu
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
> > I believe there are important security issues, but I'm sure the spec took
> > this into consideration - so probably I'm wrong ( of course, this will be
> > easy to verify later on, there are quite a few ways someone could try to
> > exploit a reversed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> > > > A) the hierarchy should go:
> > > >
> > > >SystemCL
> > > > | <-- LAYER 1
> > > > lib/common CL
> > > >/ \ <-- LAYER 2
> > > >
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > > A) the hierarchy should go:
> > >
> > >SystemCL
> > > | <-- LAYER 1
> > > lib/common CL
> > >/ \ <-- LAYER 2
> > > lib/container lib/apps CL
> > >
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for this report, I'm impressed on your deep understanding of the
> subject. Class loading is one of the most difficult areas, and until Nacho
> implemented most of the new loader scheme we had lots of problems. ( that
> happen
Hi David,
Thanks for this report, I'm impressed on your deep understanding of the
subject. Class loading is one of the most difficult areas, and until Nacho
implemented most of the new loader scheme we had lots of problems. ( that
happened few months ago ).
> Here's the list of things that I con
10 matches
Mail list logo
